I have now thought about this a bit more, and I think the way we get the information "one gets head" is important.
In the question, I put that the possible cases were:
- Head - Head
- Head - Tail
- Tail - Head
- Tail - Tail
Each tends to happen $25$% of the time.
If we see the first to fall comes up head, then we restrict to cases $1$ and $2$, and so the probabilities are $1/2$. Only in $50$% of the time we can see the first one coming up head, and in its half both coins end having head.
If the information was gotten from another person who sees the outcomes while you have not, and that person is forced to tell you that one coin came up head always that it happens, then that person will do it $75$% of the time, of which its $1/3$ is when both coins get head. So, once we know we are in those $75$%, we have $1/3$ probability.
If that another person was free to say you either "one coin came up head" or "one coin came up tail", then the probabilities are $1/2$ for both coins coming up head. The reason is that in the two cases we have got a head and a tail, that person has $1/2$ probability to report "one coin came up head".
$1)$ $25$% of the time we get two heads, and in all this cases that person tells you that one coin came up head.
$2)$ $50$% of the time we get a head and a tail, but only in half of its cases ($25$%), he tells you that one of them came up head. In the other half, he tells you that one of them came up tail.
$3)$ $25$% of the time we get two tails, and in all this cases that person tells you that one coin came up tail.
So, only in $25$% $+ 25$% $= 50$% he says you that one coin came up head, of which its half is when you have both coins head.