0

Theorem: Suppose that $f:X\to [0,\infty]$ is measurable, $E\in \mathfrak{M}$, and $\int \limits_{E}fd\mu=0$. Then $f=0$ a.e. on $E$.

It's very famous fact which can be proven easy.

Am I right that this theorem becomes false if we assume that $f:X\to (0,\infty]$?

I guess that here even condition $\int \limits_{E}fd\mu=0$ fails.

Can anyone exaplain this to me detailed why my assumption false?

RFZ
  • 16,814

1 Answers1

2

Claim: Let $m(E)>0$ and $f : E \to (0,\infty]$. Then $\int_E f>0$.

Proof: Let $E_n = \{ x\in E : f(x) \ge \frac 1n\}$. Then $\cup E_n = E$ and so

$$ \lim_{n\to\infty} m(E_n)= m(E).$$

Since $m(E)>0$, there is $n$ so that $m(E_n) >0$. Thus

$$\int_E f \ge \int_{E_n} f \ge \int_{E_n} \frac 1n = \frac 1n m(E_n) >0.$$