5

Problem: For integer $n>2$, show that $(n!)^2 > n^n$

My attempt: I tried using induction. For $n=3$, the given condition is satisfied. Let us suppose $k!^2>k^k$ for some $k\geq3$.

Then, $(k+1)!^2 =k!^2(k+1)^2> k^k(k+1)^2$

Thus if I can somehow show that $k^k(k+1)^2\geq(k+1)^{k+1}$, i.e., $k^k\geq(k+1)^{k-1}$, I am done.

Any hints/suggestions are welcome. Any non-inductive proofs are also allowed

5 Answers5

6

Carl Friedrich Gauss would have solved this aged 7.

$$\begin{align} n!^2 &= (1 \times 2 \times 3 \dots \times n) \times (1 \times 2 \times 3 \dots \times n) \\ &= (1 \times n) \times (2 \times (n-1)) \times (3 \times (n-2))\times \dots \times (n \times 1) \end{align}$$

The first and last of the $n$ factors are $n$, the others are all greater than $n$, therefore the product is greater than $n^n$ if $n > 2$.

Kitegi
  • 1,081
gnasher729
  • 10,113
5

Note that the integral

$$ \int_{1}^{n} \log x\, dx = n \log n - n + 1 $$

can be bounded above by the sum

$$ \sum_{k=2}^{n} \log k = \log(n!) $$

so, taking logarithms, it suffices to prove that $ 2 n \log n - 2n + 2 > n \log n $ for $ n > 2 $. We then have to show $ n \log n > 2n - 2 $. Define $ f(x) = x \log x - 2x + 2 $ and take derivatives to find $ f'(x) = \log x - 1 $, which implies that $ f(x) $ is increasing for all $ x \geq 3 $. We have $ f(5) = 5 \log 5 - 8 \approx 0.04 > 0 $, so this proves the result for all $ n \geq 5 $. For $ n = 3, 4$, we may verify the claim directly:

$$ 36 = (3!)^2 > 3^3 = 27 $$ $$ 24^2 > 16^2 \Rightarrow (4!)^2 > 4^4 $$

Ege Erdil
  • 17,747
4

For your induction argument, $$ k^k\geq(k+1)^{k-1}\iff\left(\frac{k}{k+1}\right)^k\geq\frac{1}{k+1}\iff\left(1-\frac{1}{k+1}\right)^k\geq\frac{1}{k+1}. $$ But the last inequality above holds because of Bernoulli's inequality: $$ \left(1-\frac{1}{k+1}\right)^k\geq 1-\frac{k}{k+1}=\frac{1}{k+1}. $$

yurnero
  • 10,505
2

A non induction proof. It's enough to show that $$ 1<\frac{1^2}{n}\times\frac{2^2}{n}\times\cdots\times\frac{n^2}{n}. $$ First, suppose $n=2k$, $k\geq 1$. Then it's enough to show $\frac{j(n+1-j)}{n}\geq 1$ for all $j=1,\ldots,k\;$ and the inequality is strict for some $j$. Consider $$ j(n+1-j)-n=j(2k+1-j)-2k=(j-1)(2k-j) $$ which is $\geq 0$ for all $j$ and $>0$ for $j\neq 1$.

For $n=2k+1$, $k\geq 1 $, we only need to worry about the extra factor $\frac{(k+1)^2}{n}=\frac{(k+1)^2}{2k+1}$ which is clearly $> 1$ via the expansion $(k+1)^2=k^2+2k+1$.

yurnero
  • 10,505
0

Two observations at the outset will make an inductive proof fairly straightforward. Note that $$ \binom{k}{\ell}<k^\ell,\qquad2\leq\ell\leq k\tag{1} $$ an inequality that is easier to verify than you might think. Also note that $$ (k+1)^k=k^k+\binom{k}{1}k^{k-1}+\sum_{\ell=2}^k\binom{k}{\ell}k^{k-\ell}<2k^{k}+\sum_{\ell=2}^kk^\ell\cdot k^{k-\ell}=(k+1)k^k\tag{2} $$ by the binomial theorem. Hence, \begin{align} [(k+1)!]^2&= [(k+1)k!]^2\\[1em] &= (k+1)^2(k!)^2\\[1em] &> (k+1)^2\cdot k^k\tag{inductive hypothesis}\\[1em] &= (k+1)[(k+1)k^k]\\[1em] &> (k+1)(k+1)^k\tag{by $(2)$}\\[1em] &= (k+1)^{k+1}, \end{align} as desired.