''There exists a point in a closed set which is at minimum distance from a point not in the set.''
I have no idea why this is true.
Any help will be appreciated.
''There exists a point in a closed set which is at minimum distance from a point not in the set.''
I have no idea why this is true.
Any help will be appreciated.
Before I begin, here are my sources:
Definition of a closed set Equivalence of Definitions of Closed Sets
My answer won't be technical, but general. We will prove this by assuming that your statement is wrong and finding a contradiction.
Let's say that there is a point x in set C and a point y in set C - R (the set C - R is the set of points in R that are not in set C.
Let's assume that your statement is wrong. That means that there will exist a point z1 (a point in set C) is less than the distance between point x and point y: (this means that point z1 is closer to point x than point y.)
Remember that point z1 is a point in set C.
Since point z1 is a point in C, this means that there will exist a point z2 (a point in set C) whose distance is less than the distance between point x and point z1: (this means that point z2 is closer to point x than point z1.)
Remember that point z2 is a point in set C.
Since point z2 is a point in C, this means that there will exist a point z3 (a point in set C) whose distance is less than the distance between point x and point z2: (this means that point z3 is closer to point x than point z2.)
Now we are creating a sequence of points: z1, z2, z3, ... zn.
And set C contains the sequence z1, z2, z3, ... zn.
You can prove that this sequence of points converge at point x. So you can prove that point x is the limit of this sequence.
So set C contains the convergent sequence z1, z2, z3, ... zn.
Since set C is closed, it must contain the limit of all convergent series within itself. In other words, set C must contain the limit of the convergent sequence z1, z2, z3, ... zn.
But point x is not inside set C.
We have reached a contradiction.