1

Here's a (possibly sloppily written) Induction proof that has me stumped. It's the first example from here and supposedly the statement holds?

(*)  For n > 1,  2 + 2^2 + 2^3 + 2^4 + ... + 2^n = 2^n+1 – 2
Let n = 1. Then:
2 + 2^2 + 2^3 + 2^4 + ... + 2^n = 2^1 = 2
...and:
2^n+1 – 2 = 2^1+1 – 2 = 2^2 – 2 = 4 – 2 = 2
So (*) works for n = 1.

 Assume, for n = k, that (*) holds; that is, that
 2 + 2^2 + 2^3 + 2^4 + ... + 2^k = 2^k+1 – 2
 Let n = k + 1.

I understand this part. This is where I get lost. (I understand that first we set n=k and then n=k+1 but the equations are sloppy and I don't follow how both sides are "equal" as the original statement asks me to prove.

 2 + 2^2 + 2^3 + 2^4 + ... + 2^k + 2^k+1    | (I assume this is the left side) 
 = [2 + 2^2 + 2^3 + 2^4 + ... + 2^k] + 2^k+1| (still on the left side) 
 = [2^k+1 – 2] + 2^k+1                      | (now we are on the right side??)
 = 2×2^k+1 – 2                              | (right side simplified)  
 = 2^1×2^k+1 – 2 
 = 2^k+1+1 – 2  
 = 2^(k+1)+1 – 2                         
 Then (*) works for n = k + 1.

Ok, so what is the final conclusion? Looks to me the sides are not equal but it's not evident what the final answer is. Seems like the statement "Then (*) works for n = k + 1." suggests that the statement holds true but I fail to see why. Thanks!

1 Answers1

2

The goal of the induction step is to show that (*) holds for $n = k+1$, in particular, we want to show $$2 + 2^2 + \cdots + 2^{k+1} = 2^{(k+1)+1}-2$$ The induction hypothesis says $2 + 2^2 + \cdots + 2^{k} = 2^{k+1}-2$. So we start with the LHS of what we want to show, and transform it to the RHS, using things we know are true. In particular

$2 + 2^2 + \cdots + 2^{k+1} = (2 + 2^2 + \cdots 2^k)+ 2^{k+1}$

$= (2^{k+1}-2) + 2^{k+1}$ by the induction hypothesis.

$= 2 \cdot 2^{k+1} - 2$ re-arranging

$= 2^{(k+1)+1} - 2$ (re-arranging some more)

And so, we have showed the LHS of what we wanted equals the RHS of what we wanted, which completes the induction.

James
  • 5,443