1

Consider a $\sigma$-finite measure space $(X,A,\mu)$ and $f,f_n\in L^p(\mu)$ with $1<p<\infty$.

If $f_n \stackrel{w}{\to} f$ and $\lim_{n\to \infty} \|f_n\|_{L^p}=\|f\|_{L^p}$ hold, then $\lim_{n\to \infty} \|f_n-f\|_{L^p}=0$ is true.

The converse is easy to prove but I'm stuck at proving this implication. If we also had pointwise convergence $f_n\to f$, I could also prove the claim. Do we necessarily have pointwise convergence?

How else might I tackle this problem?

1 Answers1

1

If $||f||_p=0$ we're done. Assuming that $||f||_p>0$, we may as well assume that $||f_n||_p=||f||_p=1$.

Now, $(f_n+f_m)/2\to f$ weakly as $n,m\to\infty$, so $$\liminf\left|\left|\frac{f_n+f_m}{2}\right|\right|\ge 1;$$since $||f_n||_p=||f_m||_p=1$ it follows that $$\lim\left|\left|\frac{f_n+f_m}{2}\right|\right|= 1.$$

It seems clear that some sort of uniform strict convexity now shows that $||f_n-f_m||_p\to0$. This is clear for $p=2$; alas I have to go to class, no time to try to work out the relevant inequality that shows this for other $p$. (But it must be right, based on the general principle that when $p=1$ and $p=2$ are different, the case $1<p<\infty$ is always like the case $p=2$...)

Edit: In fact $||f_n-f_m||_p\to0$ follows from Clarkson's Inequalities, which show that there exists an $r$ (equal to $p$ or to $p'$, depending on $p$), such that if $||f_n||_p=||f_m||_p=1$ then $$\left|\left|\frac{f_n+f_m}{2}\right|\right|_p^r+\left|\left|\frac{f_n-f_m}{2}\right|\right|_p^r\le1.$$


(There were problems with the first version of this post; getting the relevant inequality is trickier than I thought. But it's all better now...)

  • In case you stopped paying attention after deciding the first version was right, note that it was wrong. This one's right. Honest... – David C. Ullrich Feb 08 '16 at 23:16