I was wondering if it's possible to identify this limit without using L'Hôpital's Rule: $$\lim_{x \to 1} \frac{\log{x}}{x-1}$$
-
2Note that $\log 1 = 0$, so you are evaluating $\log'$ at $x=1$. – copper.hat Jan 22 '16 at 17:18
-
2Since this is precisely the limit of the difference quotient that defines the derivative of $\log x$ at $x=1$, it might motivate your Readers a little to know why you want to avoid l'Hôpital in this situation. – hardmath Jan 22 '16 at 17:19
8 Answers
In THIS ANSWER and THIS ONE I showed, without the use of calculus, that the logarithm function satisfies the inequalities
$$\frac{x-1}{x}\le \log(x)\le x-1$$
Therefore, we can write for $x>1$
$$\frac1x \le \frac{\log(x)}{x-1}\le 1$$
and for $x<1$
$$1 \le \frac{\log(x)}{x-1}\le \frac1x$$
whereupon applying the squeeze theorem yields the result $1$.

- 179,405
To elaborate on copper.hat's comment, it does not require L'Hopital's rule to recognize that
$$\lim_{x\to1}{\log x\over x-1}=\lim_{x\to1}{\log x-\log1\over x-1}=f'(1)\quad\text{where }f(x)=\log x$$
This is simply the definition of the derivative. If you also know that $f'(x)=1/x$, then you get
$$\lim_{x\to1}{\log x\over x-1}=1$$
It might be noted that L'Hopital's rule is often invoked for problems like this, but its invocation is purely a matter of convenience.

- 79,832
Rewrite this using $t = h-1$ as $$\lim_{t\to 0} \frac{\log(1+t) - 0}{t}.$$
Now try to recognize this as the derivative of a function you know.
The point of this exercise is almost certainly to recognize that this is the definition of the derivative.

- 1,173
It's simple:
$$\lim_{x \to 1} \frac{\log{x}}{x-1}$$ $$=\lim_{(x-1) \to 0} \frac{\log{[1+(x-1)]}}{(x-1)}$$ $$=\lim_{u \to 0} \frac{\log{(1+u)}}{u}$$ $$= \log'(0)$$ $$=1$$
The last step comes from this link.

- 2,782

- 24,472
-
1
-
1This is the derivative of $u\mapsto \ln(1+u)$ at $0$. I.e., $\frac{1}{1+0}=1$. – Clement C. Jan 22 '16 at 17:23
-
-
4
-
2It's curious that you posted an answer and voted to close the post. ;-)) – Mark Viola Jan 22 '16 at 19:40
If you're looking to avoid relying on knowing derivatives already, you can write $\frac{\log x}{x-1}=\frac{\int_1^x\frac{dt}{t}}{x-1}$, showing it to be the mean value of $\frac{1}{t}$ for $t\in[1,x]$. Take $x\to1$ to show that the limit is equal to $1$.

- 10,800
-
Well, the use of integrals kind of embeds derivatives through the FTC, does it not? ;-) - Mark – Mark Viola Jan 22 '16 at 19:37
Hint
Decompose the logarithm into Taylor series around $1$.

- 54,422
-
3Umm, this avoids l'Hôpital (one derivative) by taking derivatives of all orders? – hardmath Jan 22 '16 at 17:20
-
@hardmath you only need up to the quadratic term. The OP was not interested in minimizing the number of derivatives, just in avoiding to use L'Hospital's rule... – gt6989b Jan 22 '16 at 17:21
-
1I will let the OP speak for what they wanted to avoid, but to me (see my Comment) it appears the request was to avoid taking any derivatives. So when a number of answers are proposed to use the Taylor series instead, I'm not sure it is in the spirit of the Question. – hardmath Jan 22 '16 at 17:24
$$\lim_{x \to 1} \frac{\log{x}}{x-1}\quad\iff\quad\lim_{x\to 0}\frac{\log(x+1)}{x}$$
Using Taylor expansion we get
$$\lim_{x\to 0}\frac{x-x^2/2+O(x^3)}{x}=\lim_{x\to 0}(1-x/2+O(x^2))=1$$

- 4,984
From the above image it is easy to observe that, $$\frac{x-1}{x}<\int^{x}_{1}t dt<x-1$$
Since Area of smaller rectangle< Area under curve< Area of larger rectangle,
$$\rightarrow \frac{1}{x}<\frac{log(x)}{x-1}<1$$
$lim_{x \rightarrow 1} \frac{1}{x}=1$
Hence by Sandwich Theorem $lim_{x \rightarrow 1} \frac{log(x)}{x-1}=1$

- 5,068
-
Those inequalities for the logarithm can be established without the use of calculus. ;-) - Mark – Mark Viola Jan 22 '16 at 19:38