4

I have no idea of proving the following statements:

  1. $GL_n(\mathbb C) = \{ M \in M_n(\mathbb C): \det(M) \neq 0 \} $ is open and path connected in $M_n(\mathbb C)$. Is it convex?

  2. $SL_n(\mathbb R) = \{ M \in GL_n(\mathbb R): \det (M) = 1 \}$ is closed and path connected in $M_n(\mathbb R)$ (Hint: using the fact that the polynominal function: $z \to \det((1-z)A + zB)$ has a finite number of roots). Is it convex?

  3. The set of diagonalisable matrices of $M_n(\mathbb R)$ is path connected. Is it open or closed? Is it convex?

What is the general idea when dealing with the path connectedness of these sets of matrices?

SiXUlm
  • 2,436
  • The Related questions (links to the right) have many nice answers to that. – A.Γ. Dec 25 '15 at 19:36
  • I found the answers of the first question here: http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/139549/how-to-show-path-connectedness-of-gln-mathbbc – SiXUlm Dec 25 '15 at 19:36
  • The set $SL_n(\Bbb R)$ is not convex. Indeed, let $I\in M_n(\Bbb C)$ is the identity matrix. Then both $I$ and $-I$ belong to $SL_n(\Bbb R)$, but $(I+(-I))/2=0\not\in SL_n(\Bbb R)$.
  • – Alex Ravsky Dec 25 '15 at 20:17
  • 2
    @AlexRavsky : Whether $-I \in SL_n(\Bbb{R})$ depends on the parity of $n$. For instance, $-1 \not\in SL_1(\Bbb{R})$. – Eric Towers Dec 28 '15 at 06:11