4

Let $\Lambda$ be a uncountable set and let $\{a_{\alpha}\}_{\alpha\in\Lambda}$ be such that $a_{\alpha}>0$ for all $\alpha \in\Lambda$ proof that, $$\sum_{\alpha\in\Lambda}a_{\alpha}$$ diverges.

Silva
  • 980

2 Answers2

5

One should also define $\sum_{\alpha \in \Lambda}a_{\alpha}$, since this is not a standard thing, perhaps as $\sup \sum_{\alpha \in \Lambda_0}a_{\alpha}$ over all finite $\Lambda_0 \subset \Lambda$. Assume now that $\Lambda' \colon =\{ \lambda\ | \ a_{\lambda}> 0\}$ is uncountable. Now, every positive number is $\ge \frac{1}{n}$ for some $n >0$ natural. Therefore $$\Lambda' = \bigcup_{n\ge 1}\{ \lambda\ | \ a_{\lambda}\ge \frac{1}{n}\} $$ If a countable union of sets is uncountable, then at least one of the terms is uncountable ( since a countable union of countable sets is countable). So there exists $n_0\ge 1$ so that $\{ \lambda\ | \ a_{\lambda}\ge \frac{1}{n_0}\}$ is uncountable, and so infinite. For every $N_0$ natural there exists a finite subset $\Lambda_0\subset \{ \lambda\ | \ a_{\lambda}\ge \frac{1}{n_0}\}$, $| \Lambda_0| \ge N_0$. We get $$\sum_{\alpha \in \Lambda_0 } a_{\alpha} \ge \frac{N_0}{n_0}$$

Since we can take $N_0$ as large as we want, we conclude $$\sum_{\alpha \in \Lambda} a_{\alpha} = \infty$$

orangeskid
  • 53,909
2

Show the contrapositive, a convergent sequence of non-negative terms has at most countably many positive terms. Let $\sum_{i \in \Lambda} a_i$ be convergent. Then as David's hint, show that $A_n = \{i : a_i > \frac{1}{n}\}$ must be finite. Then use the fact that $A = \bigcup_{n} A_n$ must contain all strictly positive terms, but is a countable union of finite sets.

E.Lim
  • 1,185
  • 2
    I am not sure, you solution do not seen to be nice to me. – Silva Dec 13 '15 at 16:30
  • 2
    Why this prove that uncountable sum is not convergent? – Masacroso Dec 13 '15 at 16:34
  • Because it is the contrapositive statement and is logically equivalent to what you want to prove. $p \implies q$ is equivalent to $\neg q \implies \neg p$. It shows that if your uncountable sum of positive terms were convergent, then there must be countably many terms, a contradiction.So it must be divergent. – E.Lim Dec 13 '15 at 16:44
  • I dont see it @E.Lim, sorry. You are taking the example of harmonic series as some kind of theorem. From an example I dont see how you can justify your assumptions. You must prove first that $a_i>1/n$ is a kind of theorem. – Masacroso Dec 13 '15 at 16:53
  • 1
    Sorry, it wasn't my intention of spelling out every step. If there were infinitely many $a_i$ such that $a_i > \frac{1}{n}$, then the series in question must diverge by comparison. Hence there must be finitely many of them. – E.Lim Dec 13 '15 at 16:57