2

Assume $0<\alpha\leq 1$ and $x>0$. Does the following inequality hold? $$(1-e^{-x})^{\alpha}\leq (1-\alpha e^{-x})$$ I know that the reverse inequality holds if $\alpha\ge 1$.

2 Answers2

2

For $x > 0$, $0 < e^{-x} < 1$ (and this is a bijection between $(0,\infty)$ and $(0,1)$), so you can drop the exponentials and ask the same question about $$(1-y)^\alpha \leq 1-\alpha y$$ for $\alpha \in (0,1]$ and $y\in(0,1)$. Then, this should just be an exercise of convexity: consider the function $y\in(0,1) \mapsto (1-y)^\alpha$, for $\alpha \in (0,1]$.

Clement C.
  • 67,323
  • You just re-iterated my question. – sudha pandey Nov 25 '15 at 15:09
  • No. Have you even read my answer? The word "convexity" should be a hint. If a function is concave, then it is _____ its asymptotes. And you should know how to prove a smooth and easily differentiable function is convex or concave. If you are looking for a full-fledged, complete and detailed answer without your actually having to do anything, then indeed this is not what I gave. – Clement C. Nov 25 '15 at 15:12
  • @sudhapandey And also the annoying $e^{-x}$ has been washed away. – drhab Nov 25 '15 at 15:15
2

Using Bernoulli's Inequality

The reverse inequality, for $a\ge1$, is called Bernoulli's Inequality. It can be proven, in the case of integer exponents, using induction. This can be extended to the case of rational exponents, again using induction.

The inequality you mention above, for $0\lt a\le1$, follows immediately.


Using the AM-GM Inequality

For $x\gt0$ and $0\le a\le1$, the AM-GM Inequality says that $$ 1^{1-a}x^a\le(1-a)1+ax $$ Substituting $x\mapsto1-x$ yields that for $x\lt1$ and $0\le a\le1$ $$ (1-x)^a\le1-ax $$

robjohn
  • 345,667