Whenever you see anything about divisibility, you want to take the integers down to their prime factors in these steps.
1) First, I need to find the smallest multiple of both 24 and 108 so that I can find the smallest value of n2, and thus find the smallest value of n. As mentioned, I need to take them to the primes in order to do it.
The prime factors of 24 are 2 x 2 x 2 x 3. This means that any multiple of 24 must have at least three twos and one three to be a multiple of 24.
The prime factors of 108 are 2 x 2 x 3 x 3 x 3. This means that every multiple of 108 must have at least two twos and three threes to be a multiple of 108.
Since some of the two and threes overlap, we can thus say that every multiple of BOTH 24 and 108 must have at least three twos (the minimum need to make 24, with plenty for 108) and at least three threes (the minimum to make 108 with plenty for 24). Thus, the smallest number that is a multiple of 24 and 108 is 2 x 2 x 2 x 3 x 3 x 3
2) Next, I need to find the smallest possible value of n2 so that I can find the smallest value of n.
So we've got this magic number 2 x 2 x 2 x 3 x 3 x3, but while that's the smallest multiple of 24 and 108, it's not the smallest possible value of n2 because n2 is clearly a perfect square, and 2 x 2 x 2 x 3 x 3 x3 is not, because I can't just cut half of factors out and be left with an integer. I want the smallest perfect square, so I add a 2 and a 3 and get 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 3 x 3 x 3 x 3. This is acceptable because it is still a multiple of both 24 and 108 (which I know, because it contains the minimum required prime factors to make 24 and 108). This is the smallest value of n2.
3) I need to find the smallest possible value of n.
To find the smallest possible n, I take the square root of that. That means I chop out half of the twos and half of the threes. So I have 2 x 2 x 3 x 3. This is the smallest value of n, and it is 36.
4) I compare n with the answer choices. So whatever answers divide evenly into 36 are correct.
Hope this helps! Goodluck.