5

I came accross some obstacles in proving that the time $T(\delta)$ taken by a pendulum to travel from $\theta=\pi-\delta$ to a considerably distant angle $\theta=\theta_0\in(0,\pi/4)$ diverges logarithmic-ally with respect to $\delta$.

Here is my work so far.

The expression of $T(\delta)$ is $$T(\delta)=-\int_{\pi-\delta}^{\theta_0}\frac{1}{\sqrt{\frac{2g}{L}[\cos{\theta}+\cos{\delta}]}}d\theta.$$

I was able to make a heuristic argument by taking $\cos{\delta}\approx 1$ (since a cosine function is 1 up to the second order) and directly doing the integration. It indeed is a logarithm blow-up.

Not being convinced by my own argument (okay for my physics-oriented self by skeptical for my math-oriented self because $\delta$ appears both in the integral limit and in the integrand, and thus taking the limit only in the integrand seems un-justified), I came to the solution of the integral, the elliptical integral of the first kind.

What I get so far is by a standard change-of-variable (learned from Zorich) $\sin{\theta}=\frac{\sin{\psi/2}}{\sin{\phi_0/2}}$ where $\phi_0=\pi-\delta$, I changed it to a complete elliptic integral (plus a finite constant)

$$T(\delta)=\int_0^{\pi/2}\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-k^2\sin^2{\theta}}}d\theta=K(k)$$ where $k=\sin{\phi_0/2}=\sin{(\pi/2-\delta/2)}$.

It seems the remaining task is to show that $$\lim_{\delta\rightarrow0}\frac{K(\sin{(\pi/2-\delta/2)})}{\ln{\delta}}=const\neq0.$$

I'm not so familiar with the elliptic integrals and did not get readable results about this asymptotic behavior of K in Google. I'd very appreciate it if there is any derivation on this.

Thanks in advance for any answer or remark!!

Zheng Liu
  • 363
  • 1
  • 10
  • The change of coordinates is also given on Mathworld: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/EllipticIntegraloftheFirstKind.html – Cyclone Sep 10 '17 at 10:58

2 Answers2

7

I prefer to have the singular behaviour near $0$ rather than at $\frac{\pi}{2}$, so let's make the substitution $\varphi = \frac{\pi}{2} - \theta$. We obtain

$$K(k) = \int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \frac{d\varphi}{\sqrt{1 - k^2\cos^2\varphi}}.$$

Split the integral at $\frac{\pi}{4}$. The part

$$\int_{\frac{\pi}{4}}^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \frac{d\varphi}{\sqrt{1 - k^2\cos^2\varphi}}$$

remains harmless as $k \to 1$ and tends to

$$\int_{\frac{\pi}{4}}^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \frac{d\varphi}{\sin \varphi}.$$

For the other part, write $1 = \sin^2 \varphi + \cos^2 \varphi$ to obtain $1 - k^2\cos^2\varphi = \sin^2 \varphi + (1-k^2)\cos^2 \varphi$. Let $\varepsilon = \sqrt{1-k^2}$. Then

\begin{align} \int_0^{\frac{\pi}{4}} \frac{d\varphi}{\sqrt{1 - k^2\cos^2 \varphi}} &= \int_0^{\frac{\pi}{4}} \frac{\cos^2 \varphi + \sin^2 \varphi}{\sqrt{\cos^2 \varphi + \sin^2 \varphi}\cdot \sqrt{\sin^2 \varphi + \varepsilon^2 \cos^2\varphi}}\,d\varphi\\ &= \int_0^{\frac{\pi}{4}} \frac{1 + \tan^2\varphi}{\sqrt{1 + \tan^2 \varphi}\cdot \sqrt{\varepsilon^2 + \tan^2 \varphi}}\,d\varphi \tag{$t = \tan \varphi$}\\ &= \int_0^1 \frac{dt}{\sqrt{1+t^2}\cdot \sqrt{\varepsilon^2 + t^2}}\\ &= \int_0^1 \frac{dt}{\sqrt{\varepsilon^2 + t^2}} - \int_0^1 \Biggl(1 - \frac{1}{\sqrt{1+t^2}}\Biggr) \frac{dt}{\sqrt{\varepsilon^2 + t^2}}. \end{align}

Since

$$1 - \frac{1}{\sqrt{1+t^2}} = \frac{\sqrt{1+t^2}-1}{\sqrt{1+t^2}} = \frac{t^2}{\sqrt{1+t^2}\cdot (1 + \sqrt{1+t^2})},$$

the last integral remains bounded and tends to

$$\int_0^1 \frac{t \,dt}{1 + t^2 + \sqrt{1+t^2}}$$

as $\varepsilon \to 0$.

And the substitution $t = \varepsilon u$ gives us

\begin{align} \int_0^1 \frac{dt}{\sqrt{\varepsilon^2 + t^2}} &= \int_0^{\frac{1}{\varepsilon}} \frac{du}{\sqrt{1+u^2}}\\ &= \operatorname{Ar sinh} \frac{1}{\varepsilon}\\ &= \log \biggl(\frac{1}{\varepsilon} + \sqrt{1 + \frac{1}{\varepsilon^2}}\biggr)\\ &= \log \frac{1}{\varepsilon} + \log 2 + \log \frac{1 + \sqrt{1+\varepsilon^2}}{2}. \end{align}

Thus we have

$$K(k) = \log \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-k^2}} + O(1) = \frac{1}{2}\log \frac{1}{1-k} - \frac{1}{2}\log (1+k) + O(1) = \frac{1}{2}\log \frac{1}{1-k} + O(1).$$

In our specific case, with $k = \sin \bigl(\frac{\pi}{2} - \frac{\delta}{2}\bigr) = \cos \frac{\delta}{2}$, we have $\varepsilon = \sqrt{1-k^2} = \sin \frac{\delta}{2} = \frac{\delta}{2} + O(\delta^3)$, so

$$\log \frac{1}{\varepsilon} = \log \frac{2}{\delta} + O(\delta^2)$$

and overall

$$K\bigl(\cos \tfrac{\delta}{2}\bigr) = \log \frac{1}{\delta} + O(1),$$

where the $O(1)$ term is not only bounded, it in fact converges as $\delta \to 0$. We have the relevant terms:

$$K\bigl(\cos \tfrac{\delta}{2}\bigr) = \log \frac{1}{\delta} + 2\log 2 + \int_0^1 \frac{t\,dt}{1+t^2+\sqrt{1+t^2}} + \int_{\frac{\pi}{4}}^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \frac{d\varphi}{\sin \varphi} + o(1).$$

Daniel Fischer
  • 206,697
  • 1
    Yes! That's the style of making arguments which I dream I can master! I was enthralled and puzzled. For example, what made you put a $\cos^2{\phi}+\sin^2{\phi}$ on the numerator and a $\sqrt{\cos^2{\phi}+\sin^2{\phi}}$ on the denominator? I know usually it's because of many years' practice but, could I share some of your insights here? – Zheng Liu Aug 31 '15 at 07:33
  • 2
    That's the streamlined version. After playing around a little with it, it turned out that $t = \tan \varphi$ gives an integral one can deal with fairly well, then I rewrote the $1$s so that the derivative of $\tan$ appears directly. The thing is that one has to try a couple of substitutions that occur often and see whether one leads to success. It's fairly natural that one tries to pull out a $\sin \varphi$ or a $\cos \varphi$ from $\sqrt{\sin^2\varphi+\varepsilon^2\cos^2 \varphi}$. Then when one sees $\cos \varphi\cdot \sqrt{\varepsilon^2 + \tan^2 \varphi}$, it's clear that $t = \tan\varphi$ – Daniel Fischer Aug 31 '15 at 08:56
  • 2
    looks promising. From then on, it's pretty straightforward, one has $\sqrt{1+t^2} \cdot \sqrt{\varepsilon^2 + t^2}$ in the denominator, and to simplify the analysis one isolates the singular (as $\varepsilon \to 0$) factor by replacing the well-behaved one with its limit at $t = 0$. – Daniel Fischer Aug 31 '15 at 08:56
  • 1
    For completeness, one can still compute the integrals contained in your final answer explicitly as $\int \frac{t\mathrm{d}t}{1+t^2+\sqrt{1+t^2}}=\log\left(\sqrt{1+x^2}+1\right) $ and $\int \frac{\mathrm{d}x}{\sin(x)}=\log\left(\tan(x/2)\right)$. – Cyclone Sep 10 '17 at 10:55
  • 1
    Using these leads to the a nice representation of the $O(1)$ terms, namely $K(\cos(\delta/2))=\log(1/\delta)+4\log[2+\sqrt{2}]+o(1)$, if I haven't made a mistake in the calculation. – Cyclone Sep 10 '17 at 11:57
0

Let $k=\cos(\delta/2)$ be the modulus and and $k'=\sqrt{1-k^2}=\sin(\delta/2)$ be the complementary modulus; then the asymptotic expansion for small $\delta$ is given by formula 900.05 in the book by Paul F. Byrd and Morris D. Friedman "Handbook of Elliptical Integrals for Engineers and Physicists", https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-65138-0 $$ K=\sum_{m\ge 0} \left(\binom{-1/2}{m}\right)^2\left[\ln(\frac{4}{k'})-b_m\right]k'^{2m}. $$ Note that a square is missing on the right hand side in the first edition of the book. The coefficients are recursively a set of alternating harmonic sums $$ b_0=0$$ $$ b_m=2\sum_{j=1}^{2m}\frac{(-1)^{j-1}}{j}=b_{m-1}+\frac{1}{m(2m-1)}$$.

R. J. Mathar
  • 2,324
  • You did not like my edits. :) Note that the sentence starting with "The coefficients are recursively" is missing the verb and it does not make sense as a whole. Note that I removed the parentheses around the binomial because the notation $\left(!\binom{n}{m}!\right)$ is used for something else in combinatorics. – Gary Feb 06 '22 at 14:27