From the article to which you linked:
In fact, there is a sharp result in this case, due to Robinson: doubling the ball can be accomplished with five pieces, and fewer than five pieces will not suffice.
A reference is given to R. M. Robinson, On the Decomposition of Spheres, Fund. Math. 34:246–260.
It's impossible to describe the shapes of all of the pieces. Another quotation from the article:
Unlike most theorems in geometry, this result depends in a critical way on the axiom of choice in set theory. This axiom allows for the construction of nonmeasurable sets, collections of points that do not have a volume in the ordinary sense and for their construction would require performing an uncountably infinite number of choices.
Very roughly speaking, the construction of such a decomposition requires the ability to make too many arbitrary choices for them to be describable in any concrete terms. There are models of set theory in which such choices cannot be made, and in which such decompositions do not exist. This applies to four of the pieces in the $5$-piece decomposition mentioned above; the fifth is a single point.