2

Given $a_n$ be a sequence and IF $\lim_{n\to\infty}a_{n}=l$, Then prove that $\lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{a_{1}+a_2+\cdot..+a_n}{n}=l$

I do not know how to do this. Can someone help me with this?

Thanks

ATTEMPT

enter image description here

enter image description here

Taylor Ted
  • 3,408
  • Welcome to Stackexchange. You'll find that simple "Here's the statement of my exercise, solve it for me" posts will be poorly received. What is better is for you to add context: What you understand about the problem, what you've tried so far, etc. Something to both show you are part of the learning experience and to help us guide you to the appropriate help. You can consult "How to ask a good question?" for further guidance. – Matthew Leingang Aug 18 '15 at 17:13
  • It's consequence from Stolz-Cesaro theorem – Michael Galuza Aug 18 '15 at 17:16
  • See this and its "linked' section. – David Mitra Aug 18 '15 at 17:17
  • @MatthewLeingang "Welcome to Math Stack"...the Op has 739 rep. If you're going to copy and paste statements at least see if they apply... – Zach466920 Aug 18 '15 at 17:18
  • 1
    @Zach466920. Good point. It's too late for me to edit that part of the comment, but in the future I'll keep that in mind. – Matthew Leingang Aug 18 '15 at 17:23
  • @DavidMitra Kindly see my attempt, if it is proceed able than please tell me how? I will convert to LATEX if useful – Taylor Ted Aug 18 '15 at 17:35
  • @MatthewLeingang Kindly see my attempt, if it is proceed able than please tell me how? I will convert to LATEX if useful – Taylor Ted Aug 18 '15 at 17:35

4 Answers4

3

You could just apply Stolz-Cesaro blindly or to gain some insight make an argument along the following lines.

Since $a_n \to l$, for any $\epsilon>0$ there is a positive integer $N$ such that $l- \epsilon < a_n < l + \epsilon$ when $n > N$.

Hence, with $S_n = a_1 + a_2 + \ldots + a_n$,

$$\frac{1}{n}S_n = \frac1{n}\sum_{k=1}^{N}a_k + \frac1{n}\sum_{k=N+1}^{n }a_k \\\leqslant \frac1{n}\sum_{k=1}^{N}a_k + \frac1{n}(n-N)(l + \epsilon),$$

and

$$\limsup_{n \to \infty}\frac{1}{n}S_n \leqslant l + \epsilon.$$

Make a similar argument to show that

$$\liminf_{n \to \infty}\frac{1}{n}S_n \geqslant l - \epsilon.$$

Since both inequalities hold for any $\epsilon> 0$ we have

$$\limsup_{n \to \infty}\frac{1}{n}S_n = \liminf_{n \to \infty}\frac{1}{n}S_n = \lim_{n \to \infty}\frac{1}{n}S_n=l$$

RRL
  • 90,707
3

Hint:

Given $\epsilon > 0$, find $N$ so that $|a_k-L|<\epsilon/2$ for $k > N$. Then

$$\left | \frac{\sum_{k=1}^n a_k}{n} - L \right | = \left | \frac{\sum_{k=1}^n a_k - L}{n} \right | \leq \frac{\sum_{k=1}^n |a_k-L|}{n}.$$

By how this was already set up, the contribution to the average from the terms with $k > N$ is already less than $\epsilon/2$. Now try to take $n$ a bit larger, so that the contribution to the average from the terms with $k \leq N$ is also less than $\epsilon/2$.

Ian
  • 101,645
  • Please check my proof, i think i was on same lines – Taylor Ted Aug 18 '15 at 17:55
  • @TaylorTed Followup hint: prove that $|a_k-L| \leq M$ for some $M$. Then replace the terms with low index by this $M$ and see what you get. – Ian Aug 18 '15 at 17:56
  • I did not quite follow you. Can we go step by step please – Taylor Ted Aug 18 '15 at 18:01
  • @TaylorTed A convergent sequence is bounded, say by $M$. By the triangle inequality, $|a_k-L| \leq M+|L|$. Call this $M'$. Now split the sum up, into $\frac{\sum_{k=1}^{N} |a_k-L|}{n}+\frac{\sum_{k=N+1}^n |a_k-L|}{n}$, and replace all of the $|a_k-L|$ in the first term with $M'$. Now what happens? – Ian Aug 18 '15 at 18:07
2

Let $x_n=a_1+a_2+...+a_n$ and $y_n=n$. Now, $\displaystyle \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}\frac {x_{n+1}-x_n}{y_{n+1}-y_n}=\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}a_{n+1}=\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}a_{n}=l$. So by Cesaro-Stolz’s theorem, $\displaystyle \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}\frac{x_n}{y_n}=\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}\frac{a_1+a_2+...+a_n}{n}=l.$

Teman
  • 387
0

Note that

$$\lim_{n\to 0}a_n=\lim_{n\to 0}\frac{\sum_{k=1}^na_k-\sum_{k=1}^{n-1}a_k}{(n)-(n-1)}=\ell$$

By the Stolz-Cesaro Theorem we have immediately that

$$\lim_{n\to 0}\frac{\sum_{k=1}^na_k}{n}=\ell$$

Mark Viola
  • 179,405