Can someone show me:
If $x$ is a real number, then $\cos^2(x)+\sin^2(x)= 1$.
Is it true that $\cos^2(z)+\sin^2(z)=1$, where $z$ is a complex variable?
Note :look [this ] in wolfram alpha showed that's true !!!!
Thank you for your help
Asked
Active
Viewed 1.8k times
6
salim math15
- 71
-
7How do you define $\cos$ and $\sin$ on $\mathbb{C}$ ? – AnalysisStudent0414 Jun 14 '15 at 23:30
-
In R ( real number) but z is a complex variable – salim math15 Jun 14 '15 at 23:31
-
3@salimmath15: That doesn't sound like a definition. Say, if claim that $\sin i=42$, how would you argue that I'm wrong? – hmakholm left over Monica Jun 14 '15 at 23:35
-
2The LHS and RHS are both entire functions on $\mathbb{C}$. Since they coincides over $\mathbb{R}$, the coincides over the whole $\mathbb{C}$. – achille hui Jun 14 '15 at 23:35
-
look :http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=cos%C2%B2%282%2Bi%29%2Bsin%C2%B2%282%2Bi%29%3D1 – salim math15 Jun 14 '15 at 23:35
3 Answers
17
$$ \cos^2z+\sin^2z=(\cos z+i\sin z)(\cos z-i\sin z)=e^{iz}e^{-iz}=e^{iz-iz}=e^0=1. $$
HorizonsMaths
- 16,526
13
You can use the identity theorem. As they are just sums of exponentials, $\sin(z)$ and $\cos(z)$ are holomorphic, and on the real axis $\sin^2(x)+\cos^2(x)=1$. As $\mathbb{R}$ is a set with an accumulation point (namely any point in $\mathbb{R}$), they agree everywhere.
Mercy's answer is a bit simpler, but this is a good principle to keep in mind when trying to show other identities that are true for real numbers.
Ruvi Lecamwasam
- 2,002
-
-
@ Andrew ledesma , sorry your answer is very complicated and it's not helpful – salim math15 Jun 14 '15 at 23:54
-
1@salimmath15 his answer is not complicated and it is very helpful for you as you learn more about complex variables. That is part of the beauty of this website. You don't just get answers at your level, you get a spectrum of understanding. – James S. Cook Jun 15 '15 at 00:17
-
1@salinmath15 actually if you want to learn complex analysis this is something you want to keep in mind. This answer is not complicated at all and it is very helpful, perhaps not for you. – Alonso Delfín Jun 15 '15 at 00:42
-
1@salimmath15 I would strongly suggest that you have a look at the link that was provided herein. This is a robust answer and ought to be quite useful to many others. – Mark Viola Jun 15 '15 at 03:55
1
by definition (In complex Analysis):
cosz= ((e^iz)+(e^-iz))/2
sinz= ((e^iz)-(e^-iz))/2
L.H.S=(cosz+isinz)(cosz-sinz)
substitute with definitions above and manipulate algebraically. You should get this at the end: (e^iz)(e^-iz)= e^0=1= R.H.S
milka
- 11