2

How to find the square root of $11-6\sqrt{2}$?

Can anyone give me some hints for solving this question? I've forgotten how to solve it.

Daniel R
  • 3,199
Mathxx
  • 7,570

3 Answers3

4

This is a special case

$$11-6\sqrt{2}=2+9-6\sqrt{2}=(\sqrt{2})^2-2\cdot 3\cdot\sqrt{2}+3^2=(\sqrt{2}-3)^2$$

So square root of $11-6\sqrt{2}$ is $\pm(\sqrt{2}-3)$.

KittyL
  • 16,965
4

If I well understand you want: $$ \sqrt{11-6\sqrt{2}} $$ You can use the formula: $$ \sqrt{a\pm \sqrt{b}}=\sqrt{\dfrac{a+ \sqrt{a^2-b}}{2}}\pm\sqrt{\dfrac{a- \sqrt{a^2-b}}{2}} $$ that is usefull if $a^2-b$ is a perfect square.

In your case $a=11$, $b=72$ and it works. You can do it?

Emilio Novati
  • 62,675
3

To denest square roots we can use a simple, memorable algorithm described here.

Then $\:11-6\sqrt{2}\:$ has norm $= 49.\:$ $\rm\ \color{blue}{subtracting\ out}\ \sqrt{norm}\ = -7\ $ yields $\ 18-6\sqrt{2}\:$

with $\ {\rm\ \sqrt{trace}}\: =\: \sqrt{2\cdot 18}\ =\ 6.\ \ \ \rm \color{brown}{Dividing\ it\ out}\ $ of the above we obtain $\ \ \ 3-\sqrt 2$

Bill Dubuque
  • 272,048
  • Hope that I'll understand this next time. It's too complicated for me. Thanks! – Mathxx Jun 03 '15 at 14:30
  • 1
    @Mathxx Please see the linked post for the definition of norm and trace. Once you know that it is simple algebra. – Bill Dubuque Jun 03 '15 at 14:34
  • Silly question - why do you say subtracting out the square root of the norm, but then (just) add it? If the norm is $49$, why not just say "add $7 = \sqrt{49}$"? – The Chaz 2.0 Jun 03 '15 at 14:40
  • 2
    @TheChaz2.0 Stating the rule that way highlights symmetry. We $\rm\color{#0a0}{subtract}$ out a $\rm\color{#c00}{multiplicative}$ quantity (norm), then $\rm\color{#c00}{divide}$ out an $\rm\color{#0a0}{additive}$ quantity (trace). Subtraction is the additive analog of division. Stating it that way shows the analogy between both steps. The above case amounts to addition only because I chose the negative sqrt $ = -7,$ to simplify the arithmetic We are free to choose the signs in any way - see the linked proof. – Bill Dubuque Jun 03 '15 at 14:59
  • @Mathxx You might find the above comment helpful. – Bill Dubuque Jun 03 '15 at 15:05