9

Let $\alpha$ be an irrational number. For every $n$ let $z_n$ be the integer closest to the number $\alpha n$. Then we can define $$A(\alpha):= \sum_{n=1}^\infty |\alpha n - z_n|.$$

We can also define somewhat similar quantity $$B(\alpha):= \sum_{n=1}^\infty \left(\alpha n - \lfloor \alpha n \rfloor \right).$$

$A(\alpha)$ and $B(\alpha)$ are sums of non-negative numbers, so the values can be real numbers of $+\infty$.


EDIT: In fact, the above sums are clearly both equal to $+\infty$, since $n \alpha$ will be infinitely often arbitrarily close to and integer (and also to a number of the form $k+\frac12$, $k\in\mathbb Z$). See, for example, Multiples of an irrational number forming a dense subset (and several other posts on MSE).

I have missed this obvious fact when posting the question. However the sums $A'(\alpha)$ and $B'(\alpha)$ described below might still be interesting.

I left here the part about $A(\alpha)$ and $B(\alpha)$, since some users already posted some comments about these sums. If I edited the first part of the post away, those comments would not make sense.


We can also make modifications where we replace the sequence with monotone sequences: $$ \begin{align*} A'(\alpha):=& \sum_{n=1}^\infty \min_{k\le n}|\alpha k - z_k|;\\ B'(\alpha):=& \sum_{n=1}^\infty \min_{k\le n} \left(\alpha k - \lfloor \alpha k \rfloor\right).\\ \end{align*} $$

In some sense, these quantities tell us how far $\alpha$ is from rational numbers. (The monotone versions seem more closely related to question whether $\alpha$ is rational or irrational, since for rational $\alpha$ all but finitely many terms are zero, so the sum must be finite.)

My question is:

  • Were the numbers $A'(\alpha)$, $B'(\alpha)$ studied somewhere?
  • Can they be calculated for some specific irrational numbers? For example, can we calculate them for $\alpha=\ln 2$, $\alpha=\sqrt2$, $\alpha=e$, $\alpha=\pi$ or some other well-know irrational numbers?
  • Do we get $A'(\alpha)=\infty$ or $B'(\alpha)=\infty$ for some numbers? If yes, can such numbers be characterized?
  • Are they related to irrationality measure or some other ways to measure how irrational a given number $\alpha$ is?

To explain what lead me to these sums: I was thinking about question whether there is a counterexample to Minkowski's theorem for unbounded sets. (Such question was asked here. In the meantime I learned here that such example cannot be found.) So I was trying to take a line $y=\alpha x$ which does not contain any lattice points. I tried to replace the segments of this line by wider rectangles - this lead me to try to compute how wide rectangles I can add without hitting some lattice point. This is related to the question how far are the points $(n,n\alpha)$ from lattice points.

  • 1
    You may wish to have a look at Pisot numbers. – A.P. May 02 '15 at 12:41
  • @MichaelBurr I meant to evaluate them. (I.e., if they are $+\infty$ for each $\alpha$, that would answer my question.) However, I do not think that $A'(\alpha)$ and $B'(\alpha)$ are always infinite. – Martin Sleziak May 02 '15 at 12:44
  • 1
    $A$ and $B$ should be infinite for all nonintegral $\alpha$ (they are periodic for $\mathbb{Q}\setminus\mathbb{Z}$). The other two sums are more interesting (indeed) – Michael Burr May 02 '15 at 12:46
  • 1
    It is not obvious to me that $A(\alpha)$ is well-defined. Even if $n$ is the denominator of a convergent of the continued fraction of $\alpha$ then $|\alpha n-z_n|$ should behave like $\frac{1}{n}$, leading to a divergent sum. – Jack D'Aurizio May 02 '15 at 13:02
  • @JackD'Aurizio I have added a note explicitly stating that the values $+\infty$ are allowed to my post. Other than the value can be infinite, I guess they are well-defined. – Martin Sleziak May 02 '15 at 13:36
  • 2
    I bet you can compute these sums for simple quadratic irrationals such as the golden ratio. – Gerry Myerson May 09 '15 at 09:15
  • @JackD'Aurizio Exactly. The same for $A'(\alpha)$. (I've tried to compute $A'(\sqrt{2})$... haha) – metamorphy Jan 03 '19 at 12:08

1 Answers1

1

$\newcommand{\bivec}[2]{\begin{bmatrix} #1 \\ #2 \end{bmatrix}}$ Excavating. Still the series for $A'(\alpha)$ and $B'(\alpha)$ both diverge always.

Let $\alpha=[a_0;a_1,a_2,\ldots]$ be the continued fraction expansion of $\alpha$, and $p_n/q_n$ be its $n$-th convergent: $$\bivec{p_{-1}}{q_{-1}}=\bivec{1}{0},\ \bivec{p_0}{q_0}=\bivec{a_0}{1},\ \bivec{p_n}{q_n}=a_n\bivec{p_{n-1}}{q_{n-1}}+\bivec{p_{n-2}}{q_{n-2}}.$$ Then for $r\geqslant 0$ and $q_r\leqslant n<q_{r+1}$ we have $\displaystyle\min_{k\leqslant n}|\alpha k-z_k|=|\alpha q_r-p_r|$, which gives $$A'(\alpha)=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}(q_{n+1}-q_n)\cdot|\alpha q_n-p_n|\geqslant\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{q_{n+1}-q_n}{q_{n+1}+q_n}$$ by "Theorem 5" here. But $r_n=q_{n+1}/q_n$ can't converge to $1$ because $r_n=a_{n+1}+1/r_{n-1}$.

(Therefore $\dfrac{q_{n+1}-q_n}{q_{n+1}+q_n}=\dfrac{r_n-1}{r_n+1}$ can't converge to $0$.)

Thus $A'(\alpha)=+\infty$ for any (irrational) $\alpha$, and therefore $B'(\alpha)=+\infty$ too.

metamorphy
  • 39,111