Perhaps this is very easy but I would like to get a proof of isomorphism $k[x,y]/(y-x^2) \cong k[x]$.
-
10By the first isomorphism theorem, what you need is a homomorphism from $k[x,y]$ onto $k[x]$ with kernel $(y-x^2)$. Can you find such a thing? – Chris Eagle Mar 29 '12 at 19:07
-
Yes I tried, but there is an informal proof. I need a formal one though.. – Mar 29 '12 at 19:10
-
5What? There is nothing informal about the approach I outlined. – Chris Eagle Mar 29 '12 at 19:11
-
2I'm pretty sure that this has come up before. I'll look around. In any event, you seem to be able to find a homomorphism $k[x, y]/(y - x^2) \to k[x]$. You could use Euclidean division to check that the kernel is what you think it is. An easier method is to define an inverse. Where should $f(x) \in k[x]$ be sent? – Dylan Moreland Mar 29 '12 at 19:11
-
2@ChrisEagle Is $p(x,y) \mapsto p(x,x^2)$ the homomorphism we're looking for? – Rudy the Reindeer Mar 29 '12 at 19:37
-
@MattN. You beat me by few seconds :) $(y-x^2) \mapsto (x^2 - x^2) = 0$ – Mar 29 '12 at 19:39
-
@J.D. : ) (some more characters) – Rudy the Reindeer Mar 29 '12 at 19:43
-
I think we need to know what is the inverse now... – Mar 29 '12 at 19:44
-
@AliBleybel Well, you have an inclusion $k[x] \to k[x, y]$. You could compose that with the quotient homomorphism and see what happens. – Dylan Moreland Mar 29 '12 at 20:57
3 Answers
Consider the ring of polynomials in two variables over a field $k$ which we call $k[x,y]$. Then what you can do now is you can consider $k[x,y]$ as $\big(k[x]\big)[y]$; you just simply collect powers of $y$ in a polynomial in $k[x,y]$.
Now you have the evaluation map $\varphi$ that sends $y$ to $x^2$ that is constant on the coefficients (in this case the coefficients are in $k[x]$) , so that $\varphi$ extends to a ring homomorphism from $k[x,y]$ to $k[x,x^2]$. Furthermore, we see that $k[x]$ is not different from $k[x,x^2]$ because $k[x]$ and $k[x,x^2]$ are respectively by definition the smallest rings containing $k$ and the set $\{x\}$, and $k$ and the set $\{x,x^2\}$. Therefore since you know now
$$\varphi: k[x,y] \longrightarrow\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\to k[x]$$
the first isomorphism tells you that $k[x,y]/\ker \varphi \cong k[x]$, where $\ker \varphi = (y - x^2).$
Exercise: Prove that $\ker \varphi = (y - x^2)$.
Here's a detailed proof for the future readers.
Claim: If $K$ is a field, then $K[x,y]/(y-x^2) \cong K[x].$
Proof. Define $$\phi: K[x,y] \to K[x]$$ by $f(x,y) \mapsto f(x, x^2)$
It is easy to check that $\phi$ is a ring homomorphism. All that remains is to show that $\phi$ is surjective and that $ker \; \phi = (y-x^2)$.
As $K[x]$ is embedded in $K[x,y]$ as constant polynomials in $y$, we have that every $f(x,x^2)$ in $K[x]$ has a pre-image in $K[x,y]$. Thus, $\phi$ is surjective.
$$ker\; \phi = \{f(x,y) \in K[x,y]: f(x, x^2) = 0\}$$ Clearly, for any $g(x,y) \in K[x,y]$, we have $g(x,y) \cdot (y-x^2) \in ker \; \phi$.
Thus, $(y-x^2) \subseteq ker\; \phi$.
To show the other inclusion, let $p(x,y) \in ker\; \phi$. As $y-x^2$ is monic in $y$, we can divide $p$ by $y-x^2$. Thus, there exists $q(x,y)$ and $r(x,y)$ in $K[x,y]$ such that: $$p = (y-x^2)q(x,y)+r(x,y)$$ where degree of $r<1$ in $y$. This means that $r$ is a polynomial in $x$ only.
Now as $p \in ker\; \phi$, $\; p(x, x^2) = 0 \implies r(x) = 0$
Therefore, we have that $p = (y-x^2)q \implies p \in (y-x^2)$
Hence, $ker\; \phi \subseteq (y-x^2)$ and thus, $ker \; \phi = (y-x^2)$
$\therefore$ By the first isomorphism theorem, it follows that $K[x,y]/(y-x^2) \cong K[x]. \; \blacksquare$

- 164
Can't this also be seen geometrically? This may or may not be of interest to the OP, but I think it's worth posting. The only downside is that I think I need $k$ algebraically closed and of characteristic $0$.
Recall that coordinate rings of affine varieties are isomorphic iff the varieties they cut out are. Next, notice that $k[x,y]/ \langle y-x^2 \rangle$ is the coordinate ring of the usual parabola centered at the origin in $k^2$ and $k[x] \simeq k[x]/\langle 0 \rangle \simeq k[x,y]/\langle y \rangle$ is the coordinate ring of a copy of $k$. We can view this copy of $k$ as embedded into the plane, in which case the varieties are visually isomorphic, but the correspondence is given explicitly by $x \mapsto (x,x^2)$ or equivalently $(x,y^2) \mapsto x$, as others have noticed in different language.

- 3,121