Here is another proof, using regularity of the measure instead of convolution.
Claim: The result holds when $B=A^{-1}$.
Proof: By regularity there is a compact set $K$ and an open set $U$ such that $K\subset A\subset U$ and such that $m(U)<2m(K)$. The multiplication map sends $\{1\}\times K$ into $U$, so by continuity of multiplication and compactness of $K$ there is a neighbourhood $V$ of $1$ such that multiplication sends $V\times K$ into $U$. But then if $x\in V$ the sets $K$ and $xK$ are each more than half of $U$, so $K\cap xK$ is nonempty, so $x\in KK^{-1}$. Thus $KK^{-1}$ contains a neighbourhood $V$ of $1$. $\square$
Claim: The result holds in general.
Proof: By regularity we may assume both $A$ and $B$ are compact. For $x$ running over $G$ we have
$$\int m(A\cap xB^{-1}) \,dx = \int\int 1_A(y) 1_B(y^{-1}x) \,dy\,dx = m(A)m(B)>0$$
by Fubini's theorem, so there is some $x$ such that $m(A\cap xB^{-1})>0$. Now apply the previous result to $A\cap xB^{-1}$. Since
$$(A\cap xB^{-1})(A\cap xB^{-1})^{-1} \subset ABx^{-1},$$
we deduce that $AB$ contains a neighbourhood of $x$. $\square$