1

I want to learn math for machine learning, and I want to start with informal set theory.

I was reading 'naive set theory' (1960) by halmos, and it didn't seem to contain modern set notations.

If anyone knows a good material for learning informal set theory, please leave a comment.

That being said, I do not mind some rigor as long as it helps me with statistics, calculus, and other math fields used in machine learning.

iadvd
  • 8,875

2 Answers2

0

Have you already had a look at this: Khan Academy: Set Theory

ploosu2
  • 8,707
  • I'm not sure if https://www.khanacademy.org/math/probability/independent-dependent-probability/basic_set_operations is enough to enable me to write fluent set notations. –  Apr 21 '15 at 10:06
0

You can see the book "Book of Proof" of Richard Hammack; it have many diagrams and pics. The chapter about cardinals is very educational.

P.S.: Machine leaning is more about Linear Algebra and Probability Theory.

Cristhian Gz
  • 2,559
  • I started reading 'how to prove it' by velleman a while ago. How do you compare 'how to prove it' with 'book of proof'? –  Apr 28 '15 at 02:57
  • Both are very similar. I think the main difference is the style of the author. Read both: "How to prove it" has more verbosity, by other hand "Book of proof" has great diagrams. – Cristhian Gz Apr 28 '15 at 04:19