5

Let $A$ and $B$ be subsets of $\mathbb{R}^n$ (where $\mathbb{R}^n$ is Euclidean n-space). Define $A + B = \{ x + y : x \in A , y \in B \}.$ Now If $A$ and $B$ are closed sets, is $A+B$ also a closed set?

Adayah
  • 10,468
Error 404
  • 6,006

3 Answers3

8

Not always. Consider in $\mathbb{R}$: $$A = \mathbb{Z}, \quad B = \left\{ n + \frac{1}{n} : n \geqslant 2 \right\}$$ so $\frac{1}{n} \in A + B$ but $0 \not \in A+B$.

Adayah
  • 10,468
6

Take $n = 2$, take $A$ to be the $y$-axis and take $B$ to be the positive quadrant of the hyperbola $y = \frac{1}x$. Then $A$ and $B$ are both closed, but $A + B$ is the set of $(x, y)$ such that $x > 0$, which is not closed.

If $A$ and $B$ are both closed and one of them is compact, then $A + B$ is closed. See Closed sum of sets for a proof.

Rob Arthan
  • 48,577
2

\begin{align} A + B &= \{ a + b \mid a \in A, b \in B\} \\ &= \bigcup_{b \in B} \{ a + b \mid a \in A\} \\ &= \bigcup_{b \in B} (A+b)\,. \end{align} If one of the sets $A,B$ is finite, then $A+B$ is closed, because $A+b$ is closed (I think this holds in all normed spaces). But since infinite unions of closed sets are not closed in general, it seems that there should be plenty of counterexamples (two already posted here).

desos
  • 2,929
  • thanks for giving your point of view. – Error 404 Apr 12 '15 at 15:15
  • 1
    If one of the sets is finite, it is bounded, and closed bounded sets in $\mathbb R^n$ are compact. So the rule "finite + closed = closed" is a special case of the rule "compact + closed = closed" mentioned by Rob Arthan. – celtschk Apr 12 '15 at 15:31
  • Oh thanks I will see that in detail in the link given by him. :) – Error 404 Apr 13 '15 at 13:22