A slight variation of Jack's answer, falling closer in line with Euclid's proof.
If $1+x+x^2+x^3+x^4\equiv 0\pmod p$ with $p\neq 5$ prime, then $p\equiv 1\pmod 5$. This is because if $x\equiv 1\pmod p$ then $1+x+x^2+x^3+x^4\equiv 5\not\equiv 0\pmod p$, but $x^5\equiv 1\pmod p$ so $x$ is of order $5$ modulo $p$, and hence $p-1$ is divisible by $5$.
Now let $p_1,p_2,\dots, p_k$ be any set of primes.
Then let $m=5p_1p_2\cdots p_k$ and let $n=1+m+m^2+m^3+m^4$. Then any prime $p$ which is a divisor of $n$ is not one of $5,p_1,\cdots, p_k$. And we have $m^5-1\equiv 0\pmod p$ so $p\equiv 1\pmod 5$ since $m\not\equiv 1\pmod p$.
This works really for any number $k$, not just $k=5$.
Theorem: Given positive integer $k$, there exists infinitely many primes of the form $kn+1$.
Proof: Let $\Phi_k(x)$ be the cyclotomic polynomial for $k$. Then:
$$\Phi_k(x)\equiv 0\pmod{p}$$
only if $p\equiv 0,1\pmod k$. (That's something to prove, definitely.) Then the above proof works by taking taking the products of any finite set of primes and $k$ to get $K$ and find a new prime of this form by finding a prime factor of $\Phi_k(K)$.
So, for example, if $k=4$ then $\Phi_4(x)=x^2+1$ and $\Phi_4(4K)=16K^2+1$ is only divisible primes of the form $4n+1$.
Or if $k=6$, then $\Phi_6(x)=x^2-x+1$, and any prime factor of $\Phi_6(6n)=36n^2-6n+1$ is $\equiv 1\pmod{6}$ and not a divisor of $n$. So if $p\mid 36n^2-6n+1$ then $$p\mid 4(36n^2-6n+1)=(12n-1)^2 +3$$ so $-3$ is a square modulo $p$, which is only true when $p\equiv 1\pmod 3$ or $p=2,3$.