Let $x$ and $y$ be positive integers such that $xy \mid x^2+y^2+1$. Show that $$ \frac{x^2+y^2+1}{xy}= 3 \;.$$ I have been solving this for a week and I do not know how to prove the statement. I saw this in a book and I am greatly challenged. Can anyone give me a hint on how to attack the problem? thanks
-
xy|x2+y2+1 means? – Chandra Sekhar Mar 01 '12 at 14:25
-
1Hint: Have you see http://www.artofproblemsolving.com/Wiki/index.php/1988_IMO_Problems/Problem_6 ? This yields to a similar attack. – David E Speyer Mar 01 '12 at 14:28
-
$xy$ divides$ x^2+y^2+1$ – Keneth Adrian Mar 01 '12 at 14:28
-
@DavidSpeyer, thanks for the link.. will study on it..:) – Keneth Adrian Mar 01 '12 at 14:34
-
1It seems that the solutions with $x>y$ are $x=F_n$, $y=F_{n+2}$ with $n$ odd, that is, $F_n^2+F_{n+2}^2 + 1= 3 F_{n}F_{n+2}$ when $n$ is odd. Is this a well-known Fibonacci identity? – lhf Mar 01 '12 at 16:00
-
@lhf If one plots the hiperbola, the integer solutions effectively appear at $x=1,5,13,\dots$ – Pedro Mar 01 '12 at 20:44
-
@PeterT.off, you've missed $x=2, y=5$. – lhf Mar 01 '12 at 22:09
5 Answers
Use the very tricky technique called Vieta Jumping.
The idea is considering a polynomial $f(x,y)$ that is quadratic in both $x$ and $y$, with integer coefficients and symmetrical (that is $f(x,y)=f(y,x)$. We have that if $f(x,y)$ has some property when $x,y$ are integers and we want to prove something regarding $x$ and $y$. Suppose that some pair $x_1,y_1$ of integers satisfies the property, since $f$ is symmetrical, we can suppose WLOG that $x_1>y_1$ (the case $x_1=y_1$ is usually easy).
Recall the vieta formulas:
If $z_1$ and $z_2$ are the roots of $x^2+bx+c=0$, then $z_1z_2=c$ and $z_1+z_2=-b$.
Those formulas are very useful, particularly the last one, since it is a simple sum.
Now since $f(x,y)$ is quadratic in $x$, we apply the vieta formulas in $x_1$ and we find some integer $x_0$ with $x_0<y_1$ that satisfy the same property, Now we do the same with $y_1$ and find another integer $y_0$ with $y_0<x_0$ that also satisfy the property. Continuing this way we get a pair $(a,b)$ of integers that satisfy the property with $a$ and $b$ really small (like $a=1$). It's easy to prove what we want when the integers are small. Now since all these pairs were satisfying the same property, what we proved about $(a,b)$, also applies to the initial $(x_1,y_1)$.
Well, that was kinda long. I hope i have explained the main point. Try to use this on the problem and then back and post your results :)

- 3,413
- 23
- 45
-
4+1: In case people are wondering how, check out the second example (which is exactly this problem!) on the wiki page on Vieta Jumping: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vieta_jumping#Example_2 – Aryabhata Mar 01 '12 at 21:44
-
1Beautiful - I wasn't not aware of Vieta Jumping before! – Jason DeVito - on hiatus Mar 02 '12 at 02:04
Suppose $xy\mid x^2+y^2+1$ and let $t=\displaystyle\frac{x^2+y^2+1}{xy}$ such that $t\in\mathbb{N}$.
Construct the set, $$S=\left\{(x,y)\in\mathbb{N}\times\mathbb{N} : \frac{x^2+y^2+1}{xy}=t\in\mathbb{N}\right\}$$
We deduce that $\displaystyle\frac{x^2+y^2+1}{xy} \ge 3$ because $\displaystyle\frac{x^2+y^2+1}{xy}<3$ implies $x^2+y^2+1 \le 2xy \le x^2+y^2$ which is clearly a contradiction. Now fix $t$ and suppose that $t>3$. Since $S\neq \varnothing$, we can choose $(a,b)\in S$ such that $a+b$ is minimal and $t>3$. WLOG assume $a\ge b>0$. Let us consider the quadratic
$$p(w)=w^2-tbw+b^2+1=0$$
It follows that $a$ is a solution since $(a,b)\in S$ and hence satisfies the quadratic equation, that is $a$ is a root. By applying Vieta's formulas we obtain the other root $c$. Hence $a+c=tb$ and $ac=b^2+1$. Since $c=tb-a$ we have $c\in\mathbb{Z}$. Now it remains to prove that $(a,c)\in S$.
To this end suppose $c<0$. It follows that $$\displaystyle 0<a^2+ac+1-3ab=a^2+ac-\frac{3c}{t}(a+c)<0$$ which is clearly a contradiction. It also immediately follows that $c\neq 0$ as this implies $b^2+1=0$. Therefore $c\in\mathbb{N}$ and $(a,c)\in S$.
Now we show that this $c$ contradicts the minimality of $a$, that is $c<a$. Suppose $c>a$ so it follows that $a+1\le c$. But from Vieta's equations we obtain $\displaystyle a+1\le c=\frac{b^2+1}{a}\le a+\frac{1}{a}$ which is impossible since this inequality holds in $\mathbb{N}$ if and only if $a=1$ and hence $a=b=1$ implying $t=3$ which contradicts our assumption that $t>3$. Therefore $c\le a$. But if $c=a$ then this implies that $\displaystyle a^2=b^2+1>\frac{9}{4}b^2$ which again is a contradiction. Hence we conclude that $c<a$ and as a result $c+b$ contradicts the minimality of $a+b$. Hence $t=3$

- 1,883
-
Since $x$ and $y$ are positive, the fact that $c > 0$ follows from identity $ac = b^2 + 1 \Rightarrow c = \frac{b^2+1}{a}$, since we assumed $a>0$. – enedil Apr 18 '17 at 20:15
I found this on Wolfram under the Fibonacci Number page:
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/FibonacciNumber.html
Catalan's Identity:
$F(n)^2 - F(n-r)F(n+r) = (-1)^{(n-r)}F(r)^2$
For $r = 1$, n is even
$F(n)^2 - F(n-1)F(n+1) = -1$
Replace F(n) using $F(n) = F(n+1) - F(n-1)$ and you get
$(F(n+1) - F(n-1))^2 - F(n-1)F(n+1) = -1$
or
$F(n+1)^2 + F(n-1)^2 + 1 = 3F(n-1)F(n+1)$
is of the form:
$x^2 + y^2 + 1 = 3xy$
I do not believe it shows that only Fibonacci numbers are solutions. The relationship that I was looking for on my other solution uses Catalan's Identity, with r = 2.

- 61
My try(wrong, post factum)
$$\frac{x^2+y^2+1}{xy}=k$$
Or:
$$\frac{x}{y}+\frac{y}{x}+\frac{1}{xy}=k$$
Now, we try to bound that integer:
Edit:
$$?>\frac{x}{y}+\frac{y}{x}+\frac{1}{xy}\geq\frac{3}{\sqrt[3]{xy}} \ \ \ \ \ (1)$$
We should deduce that $k=3$
$(1)$-GM

- 6,780
- 2
- 29
- 47
-
-
2Your AM-GM goes the wrong way. I am skeptical that anything like this can work: $(x^2+y^2+1)/(xy)$ can take plenty of values larger than $3$; those values just aren't integers. – David E Speyer Mar 01 '12 at 16:30
$x$ divides $x^2 + y^2 + 1$ implies $y^2 = ax - 1$.
Then $y$ divides $x(x+a)$
Case 1 - $y$ divides $x$, so $x = by$.
$$1/b + b + 1/(by^2) = k$$.
$$b=x=y=1$$
$$k=3$$
Or, $b=x=2$, $y=1$, $k=3$
Case 2 - $y$ divides $x+a$, so $y = -a \text{ mod } x$, $y^2 = 1 \text{ mod } x$.
$$x^2 + y^2 +1 = 2 \text{ mod } x$$
$x$ is $1$ or $2$. (Otherwise, $x$ does not divide the equation)
If $x = 1$, $x^2 + y^2 +1 = 2 \text{ mod } y$, $y$ is $1$ or $2$
If $x = 2$, $y$ is $1$ or $5$.
Solutions: $(1,1),(2,1),(5,2)$, $k$ is always $3$
(Tough to type on the phone)

- 61
-
Interestingly I got back to my computer and found (5,13) was also a solution, found by the same algorithm, plugging 5 in for x. Plugging in 13 etc, I get the solution (13,34) (34,89) (89,233). Hmmm. More work needed. – Michael Sink Mar 01 '12 at 20:33
-
2As they have pointed out, this has to do with Fibonacci numbers. Also, I edited your answer. – Pedro Mar 01 '12 at 20:41
-
Thanks for the edit, Peter. I've found one error already, checking to see if that generates the rest of the sequence. – Michael Sink Mar 01 '12 at 20:56
-
1Nope, my equation falls apart. Interesting that it generated 3 solutions. – Michael Sink Mar 01 '12 at 21:24
-
Your cases 1 and 2 aren't exhaustive. For example, 6 divides the product of 2 and 2+1; but it divides neither of them. – John Bentin Mar 01 '12 at 21:48
-
The problem is in case 2. y = -1 mod x, not 1 mod x. It opens up a lot more solutions, which can be found by factoring x^2 +1. F(n+4) * F(n) = F(n+2)^2 + 1, but I can't figure out why. – Michael Sink Mar 01 '12 at 21:56
-
John, I understand your example now. I needed to add a case where $gcd(x,y) > 1$ . In that case, neither x nor y divides the equation. – Michael Sink Mar 01 '12 at 22:29