No, this scenario is counter intuitive.
The model is that a card is picked at random, and then a side is displayed at random.
There are six equally probable results of this -- one for each face. Three of these result in displaying a green side and only one of those will have red on the other side.
The probability that the other side is also green given that a green side is displayed is: $2/3$.
Remark The information that "a green side is displayed" is not the same as knowing "the card has a green side", or even that "the card isn't double red."
By listing all the outcomes of the card drawn and side displayed (first or second).
$$\{\overbrace{\underbrace{GG:1, GG:2, GR:1}_\text{you see a green side}, GR:2}^\text{the card isn't double red}, RR:1, RR:2\}$$
The likelihood of drawing each card is equal, but if a card with two green sides is drawn it is twice as likely to display a green side than if the card with one green side were drawn. Therefore, if a green side is displayed the card is twice as likely to be a double green card than a single green card.
Let $C$ be the card drawn, taking values $\{0, 1, 2\}$ for the number of green sides. (So $C=0$ is the red-red card, et cetera).
Let $D$ be the colour displayed, taking values $\{0, 1\}$ for red or green respectively.
So we want to find: $\mathsf P(C=2 \mid D=1)$
$$\begin{align}
& = \cfrac{\mathsf P(C=2)\cdot\mathsf P(D=1\mid C=2)}{\mathsf P(C=2)\cdot\mathsf P(D=1\mid C=2)+\mathsf P(C=1)\cdot\mathsf P(D=1\mid C=1)+\mathsf P(C=0)\cdot\mathsf P(D=1\mid C=0)}
\\[1ex] & = \cfrac{\cfrac 1 3 \cdot\cfrac{2}{2}}{\cfrac 1 3 \cdot\cfrac{2}{2}+\cfrac 1 3 \cdot\cfrac{1}{2}+\cfrac 1 3 \cdot\cfrac{0}{2}}
\\[1ex] & = \dfrac 2 3
\end{align}$$