Consider any verbal statement. To negate it involves going back to its symbolic form, for example, $$\lnot P\lor(Q(x)\to\lnot R),$$ finding a symbolic sentence that has its opposite truth value no matter what meanings we assign to their atoms (here, there are three atoms: $P,Q(x)$ and $R$) and what set of objects we are discussing (here, $x$ varies over these objects), and finally translating the result to verbal form. In other words, negating a statement logically flips its truth value.
Is $\lnot P$ just the opposite of $P,$ or is it anything but $P\;?$
The logic formula $P$ has the opposite truth value as its negation $\lnot P.$
The set $S$ contains every element that is not in its complement $S^\complement.$
Consider this:
- Let $T$ be the set of tautologies,
and $P$ be the formula $x\in T,$ i.e., $x$ is a tautology.
- Then $\lnot P$ means $x\in T^\complement;$ so, \begin{align}\lnot P\iff{}&x\text{ is either a contradiction or a contingency}\\\kern.6em\not\kern-.6em\implies{}&x\text{ is a contradiction (the negation/‘opposite’ of a tautology)}.\end{align}
$P$ = "None of the basketball players are blond"
Is $\lnot P$: "All the basketball players are blond" (exact opposite of $p$)?
Or is $\lnot P$: "At least one of the basketball players is blond" (anything but $p$)?
Following the procedure outlined above, we (use predicate instead of propositional logic to) symbolise “None of the basketball players are blond” as $$\forall x \;\lnot B(x);$$ no matter what the atom $B(x)$ means (e.g., $\text“x$ is blond”, $\text“x$ has four legs”, etc.) and what the universe of discourse is (e.g., the of basketball players in Beverly Hills High, the set of furniture at Pinewood Studios), this sentence has the opposite truth value as $$\exists x \; B(x);$$ thus, the required negation must be “Some basketball player is blond”, in other words, “At least one of the basketball players is blond” (the second option that you provided).
On the other hand, the first option, “All the basketball players are blond”, and “None of the basketball players are blond” are both true when the universe of discourse is the empty set, and are both false when the universe of discourse is {blond basketballer John, brunette basketballer Mary}, so do not always have opposite truth values, so are not negations of each other.