2

Let $k$ be a field, $A=k[t,s]$, and $C=A[z]/(tz-s)$. How can I prove, using the ideals $tA$ and $sA$, that $C$ is not flat over $A$? (Liu, Algebraic Geometry and Arithmetic Curves, Exercise 2.6(c).)

I know that if $A$ is a Dedekind domain then $A$-module is flat if and only if it is not torsion-free over $A$. But Dedekind domains are new structures for me so I'm not sure if $k[t,s]$ is a Dedekind domain. Or do I have to show that not both of $tA$ and $sA$ can't be maximal or prime over $A_{tA}$ or $A_{sA}$?

user26857
  • 52,094
  • Answer here http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/110599/why-isnt-mathbbcx-y-z-xz-y-a-flat-mathbbcx-y-module for $k = \mathbf{C}$, but... – Olórin Jan 19 '15 at 17:12
  • @RobertGreen: The answer by Pierre-Yves Gaillard in the link you gave is for any commutative ring, which is much more general than the question asked. – Krish Jan 19 '15 at 17:17
  • @Krish Hum yes, the question is for $k=\mathbf{C}$, but... the answer works for any commutative ring $k$ with unit. That's what I meant. – Olórin Jan 19 '15 at 17:36
  • 1
    $k[s,t]$ is not a Dedekind domain since $\dim k[s,t]=2$. – user26857 Jan 19 '15 at 19:18

1 Answers1

2

Hint. If $C$ is $A$-flat, then $(sA\cap tA)C=sC\cap tC$. Does this equality hold?

user26857
  • 52,094