1

Is there an elementary way to proof that $$\int_0^\infty \frac{\sin{x}}{x} \mathrm{d}{x} = \frac{\pi}{2}$$ or equivalently $$\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \frac{\sin{x}}{x} \mathrm{d}{x} = \pi \;\;\; \text{?}$$

Prequesites (which might be assumed):

  1. Basic knowledge about limits, complex numbers, differentiation, series and power series as well as indefinite Riemann-integration in one dimension may be assumed (including Riemann-sums).
  2. No complex or multi-dimensional calculus as well as Fourier-analysis.

Note (1):

Sorry if the question is covered somewhere already I couldn't find it. Also it is absolutely clear that the integral can be solved by a multitude of approaches if the prerequisites are dropped among them fourier analysis, polar coordinates and complex analysis.

Note (2): The closest thing I found was a combination of Robin Chapman's Approach 1 and Zarax's method used in Approach 2. This essentially reduces to first showing by integration by parts that $$\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \frac{\sin{x}}{x} \mathrm{d}{x} = S \Longleftrightarrow \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \frac{\sin^2{x}}{x^2} \mathrm{d}{x} = S$$ and then showing that $$ S = \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \frac{\sin^2{x}}{x^2} \mathrm{d}{x} = \pi$$ as described in Approach 1. Which is what I will post as fleshed out answer later.

Note (3): For completness sake possible solutions to the problem are already collected in Solving the dirichlet Integral but as stated in the comments I was looking for something more basic.

Nevertheless any other basic approaches (not already collected there) are highly welcome!

gst
  • 72
  • Are you ok with differentiation under the integral sign? – mrf Jan 13 '15 at 12:30
  • Interchange of limits/differentiation and integrals should be okay as long as you do not need multivariate calculus (i.e. interchange of integrations). In other words one can assume that uniform convergence is a known concept. – gst Jan 13 '15 at 12:35
  • I'm aware of most of the answers given in: Alex Silva's Ref. From them only three or four come within the range of what I'm looking for: No. 1, No. 2, No. 3 and a duplicate of mrf's answer No.4. But basically I was hoping for something even more basic. – gst Jan 13 '15 at 12:57
  • Oh, was there an duplicate there? I scrolled through it and couldn't find one. I missed that one. I should probably delete mine then. – mrf Jan 13 '15 at 13:08

0 Answers0