A logarithm of base b for x is defined as the number u such that $b^u=x$. Thus, the logarithm with base $e$ gives us a $u$ such that $e^u=b$.
In the presentations that I have come across, the author starts with the fundamental property $f(xy) = f(x)+f(y)$ and goes on to construct the natural logarithm as $\ln(x) = \int_1^x \frac{1}{t} dt$.
It would be suprising if these two definitions ended up the same, as is the case. How do we know that the are? The best that I can think of is that they share property $f(xy) = f(x)+f(y)$, and coincide at certain obvious values (x=0, x=1). This seems weak. Is their a proof?