27

Any automorphism of a group $G$ is a bijection that fixes the identity, so an easy upper bound for the size of $\operatorname{Aut}(G)$ for a finite group $G$ is given by

\begin{align*}\lvert\operatorname{Aut}(G)\rvert \leq (|G| - 1)! \end{align*}

This inequality is an equality for cyclic groups of orders $1$, $2$ and $3$ and also the Klein four-group $\mathbb{Z}_2 \times \mathbb{Z_2}$. I think it's reasonable to believe that they are the only groups with this property. The factorial $(|G| - 1)!$ is eventually huge. I searched through groups of order less than $100$ with GAP and found no other examples.

The problem can be reduced to the abelian case. We can check the groups of order $< 6$ by hand. Then if $|G| \geq 6$ and the equality holds, we have $\operatorname{Aut}(G) \cong S_{|G|-1}$. Now $\operatorname{Inn}(G)$ is a normal subgroup of $\operatorname{Aut(G)}$, and is thus isomorphic to $\{(1)\}$, $A_{|G|-1}$ or $S_{|G|-1}$. This is because $A_n$ is the only proper nontrivial normal subgroup of $S_n$ when $n \geq 5$. We can see that $(|G| - 1)!/2 > |G|$ and thus $\operatorname{Inn}(G) \cong G/Z(G)$ is trivial.

How to prove that there are no other groups for which the equality $\lvert\operatorname{Aut}(G)\rvert = (|G| - 1)!$ holds? Are any better upper bounds known for larger groups?

the_fox
  • 5,805
  • 2
    If $G$ is abelian, then inversion is a central automorphism. What does the center of the symmetric groups look like? –  Feb 13 '12 at 16:47
  • 2
    Since I added a different proof below, I wanted to finish the proof I started in the comment above: since (most of) the symmetric groups have trivial center, inversion is trivial on $G$. This means every element of $G$ is order $2$, and $G$ is an elementary abelian $2$-group. But it's easy to see that $|GL(n,2)| < (2^n-1)!$ for $n>2$; indeed, the $2^n-3$ factor is missing from the left side. –  Feb 13 '12 at 17:25
  • what is $\text{Inn}(G)$? – Davius Sep 01 '22 at 14:41

6 Answers6

22

Even without the classification of finite simple groups, quite reasonable bounds are known, for example in work of P.M. Neumann. If the group $G$ can be generated by $r$ but no fewer elements, then no automorphism of $G$ can fix the $r$ given generators, so there are at most $\prod_{j=1}^{r} (|G|-j)$ different automorphisms of $G,$ since the $r$ generators must have distinct images, none of which is the identity. As P.M. Neumann has observed, $G$ can always be generated by ${\rm log}_{2}(|G|)$ or fewer elements, so we have $r \leq \lfloor {\rm log}_{2}(|G|) \rfloor .$ For $|G| >4,$ this always gives a strictly better bound for the size of ${\rm Aut}(G)$ than $(|G|-1)!.$ For large $|G|,$ it is much better. Using the classification of finite simple groups, much better bounds are known.

Later edit: Perhaps I could outline Neumann's argument, since it is quite elementary, and I do not remember a reference: Let $\{x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_r \}$ be a minimal generating set for $G$ and let $G_i = \langle x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_i \rangle $ for $i >0,$ $G_{0} = \{ e \}.$ Then for $1 \leq i \leq r,$ we have $|G_i| > |G_{i-1}|$ by minimality of the generating set. Furthermore, $|G_i|$ is divisible by $|G_{i-1}|$ by Lagrange's theorem, so $|G_i| \geq 2|G_{i-1}|.$ Hence $|G| = |G_r| \geq 2^r.$

Shaun
  • 44,997
  • The Klein 4 case still allowed equality, which is noted in the question. This is consistent with the argument above, but was obscured by the original wording, so I have done a minor edit. – Geoff Robinson Feb 13 '12 at 17:52
  • I had lectures with Neumann! Very thorough and witty, unfortunately they only gave him a 4 week module. – Adam Feb 13 '12 at 19:04
  • Although "better upper bounds" was a secondary question, I decided to accept this answer because I like that proof. Thanks to everyone else for answering too. – Mikko Korhonen Feb 17 '12 at 19:51
  • I've never seen that argument about the size of a generating set before - very cute! It seems like you could show the bound even more simply by noting that all of the products $\Pi_{i\in S}x_i$ for the $2^r$ subsets $S \subseteq {1\ldots r}$ are distinct (by minimality)? – Steven Stadnicki Feb 23 '12 at 18:12
  • @Steven Stadnicki : Maybe, but are you not assuming that the generators commute o even make sense of those products? I nearly put in the remark that using the minimality, we have $|{\rm Aut}(G)| \leq \prod_{j=1}^{r} \left( |G|-|G_{j-1}| \right) $ because for any automorphism $\alpha,$ we must have $\alpha(x_j)$ outside $\alpha(G_{j-1})$, since ${ \alpha(x_1), \ldots \alpha(x_r) }$ is also a minimal generating set. – Geoff Robinson Feb 23 '12 at 18:25
  • @GeoffRobinson Not at all! You can simply take them in order from $1\ldots r$ in each product; for instance if $r=6, S={1,3,4,5}$ then the product element $x_S$ would be $x_1x_3x_4x_5$. For any two subsets $S\neq T$ of ${1\ldots r}$ there's some index $i$ in one subset but not the other, and the corresponding generator can be isolated by multiplying by appropriate inverses; for instance, $x_1x_3x_4x_5\neq x_2x_3x_5$ because otherwise we would have e.g. $x_4 = x_3^{-1}x_1^{-1}x_2x_3x_5x_5^{-1}$ (with the last two terms then canceling, of course), contradicting minimality. – Steven Stadnicki Feb 23 '12 at 18:38
  • @Steven: OK, thanks. – Geoff Robinson Feb 23 '12 at 19:03
  • 1
    This is just a remark to sharpen the $r$ here. A $p$-group of order $p^k$ can be generated by $k$ elements. Since the union of the Sylow subgroups of a finite group generates the whole group, we can conclude that a group of order $m=p_1^{a_1}p_2^{a_2}\cdots p_n^{a_n}$ can be generated by $a_1+a_2+\cdots +a_n$ elements. Of course, this fact is only useful if you can factor $m$. But if you can, this bound is often better than (the already impressive) $\lfloor \log_2(m)\rfloor$. –  Oct 11 '14 at 01:26
13

I think I have found a different solution. Is this correct?

Suppose that $G$ is a group and $|G| > 4$. To prove that $|\operatorname{Aut}(G)| < (|G| - 1)!$, it is enough to find a bijection $f: G \rightarrow G$ with $f(1) = 1$ that is not an automorphism.

First of all, let $a$ be some nonidentity element of $G$. Let $b \in G \backslash \{1, a, a^{-1}\}$ and $x \in G \backslash\{1,a,b, ab\}$. Define the map $f: G \rightarrow G$ by $f(ab) = x$, $f(x) = ab$ and $f(g) = g$ for rest of the elements in $G$. Then $f$ is a bijection that fixes $1$, but $f(ab) \neq f(a)f(b)$ because $x \neq ab$.

12

I believe this is an exercise in Wielandt's permutation groups book.

$\newcommand{\Aut}{\operatorname{Aut}}\newcommand{\Sym}{\operatorname{Sym}}\Aut(G) \leq \Sym(G\setminus\{1\})$ and so if $|\Aut(G)|=(|G|-1)!$, then $\Aut(G) = \Sym(G\setminus\{1\})$ acts $|G|-1$-transitively on the non-identity elements of G. This means the elements of G are indistinguishable. Heck even subsets of the same size (not containing the identity) are indistinguishable. I finish it below:

In particular, every non-identity element of G has the same order, p, and G has no proper, non-identity characteristic subgroups, like $Z(G)$, so G is an elementary abelian p-group. However, the automorphism group is $\newcommand{\GL}{\operatorname{GL}}\GL(n,p)$ which, for $p \geq 3, n\geq 2$, only acts at most $n-1$-transitively since it cannot send a basis to a non-basis. The solutions of $p^n-1 \leq n-1, p \geq 3, n \geq 2$ are quite few: none. Obviously $\GL(1,p)$ has order $p-1$ which is very rarely equal to $(p-1)!$, when $p=2, 3$. $\GL(n,2)$ still can only act $n$-transitively if $2^n-1 > n+1$, since once a basis's image is specified, the other points are determined, and the solutions of $2^n-1 \leq n+1$ are also limited: $n=1,2$. Thus the cyclic groups of order 1,2,3 and the Klein four group are the only examples.

Jack Schmidt
  • 55,589
6

Consider $G$ as a subgroup of $S_{|G|}=S$ via the regular representation. Then the normalizer of $G$ is the holomorph of $G$, and saying $|Aut(G)|=(|G|-1)!$ is the same as saying that $N_S(G)=S$. In other words, $G$ is a normal subgroup of order $n$ in $S_n$. This can only happen for $n<5$, and you get the following four groups: trivial, order 2, order 3, Klein 4.

3

Well, for starters, to get equality you would need every element to have the same order, and so that order is a prime (so your group has prime-power order).

You should next realise that if you have equality then you must have equality in $C_p$, the cyclic group of order $p$, as there must exist a homomorphism which switches every element of $\langle g\rangle$, where $g$ is an element of order $p$, and keeps every other element in you group fixed. Clearly this doesn't happen if $p=2$ or $p=3$.

For $p=2$, notice that is doesn't work for $C_2\times C_2\times C_2$, but that the observation in the above paragraph still must hold (that you can restrict to subgroups and still get an automorphism).

For $p=3$, notice that is doesn't work for $C_3\times C_3$, but that the observation in the above paragraph still must hold (that you can restrict to subgroups and still get an automorphism).

user1729
  • 31,015
2

I am quite late here, but perhaps the result is worth mentioning. For each prime power $q=p^k$, define $\theta(q) = \lvert \operatorname{GL}_k(p)\rvert$, the order of $\operatorname{Aut}(C_p^k)$. For a positive integer $n=p_1^{a_1}\ldots p_k^{a_k}$ let $\theta(n) = \prod_{i=1}^k\theta(p_i^{a_i})$. So $\theta(n)$ is basically the order of the automorphism group of the unique elementary abelian group of order $n$. (I am abusing terminology a little here by calling a group elementary abelian if it is a direct product of elementary abelian groups in the usual sense.)

Now, as to your second question, Peter Neumann has shown that for a finite group $G$ of order $n$, $\lvert\operatorname{Aut}(G)\rvert$ divides $|G/Z(G)|\theta(n)$, or equivalently that $\lvert\operatorname{Out}(G)\rvert$ divides $\theta(n)$. The implied upper bound is sharp since equality is attained infinitely often (for elementary abelian groups).

If $G$ is nilpotent of order $n$ then $\lvert\operatorname{Aut}(G)\rvert$ divides $\theta(n)$. See here for a proof. In that same paper, Birkhoff and Hall show that if $G$ is soluble of order $n$ then $\lvert\operatorname{Aut}(G)\rvert$ divides $n\theta(n)$. Neumann improves this by showing that if $G$ is soluble of order $n=p_1^{a_1}\ldots p_k^{a_k}$ and $P_i \in \operatorname{Syl}_{p_i}(G)$ for $i \leq k$, then $\lvert\operatorname{Aut}(G)\rvert$ divides $|G/Z(G)|\cdot \prod_{i=1}^k\lvert\operatorname{Aut}(P_i)\rvert$. The proof of that last result (which is basically a lemma in Suzuki's "Group Theory II") is very cool.

the_fox
  • 5,805