2

Use the standard Euclidean inner product on $\mathrm R^4$.

Let $W$ be the subspace of $\mathrm R^4$ spanned by

$u_1 = (1, 1, 1, 1),$

$u_2 = (2, 4, 1, 5),$

$u_3 = (1, -5, 4, -8).$

Find an orthogonal basis for $W.$

I don't understand this topic at all. I know finding basis, what inner product is, norm, etc (basic parts).

Please try to explain it very very simply for me. Thank you!

The "Gram Schmidt" process is to be used..

George Apriashvili
  • 1,123
Newton
  • 99
  • Here's an outline of the GS process: http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/695853/understanding-the-gram-schmidt-process – Erik M Dec 10 '14 at 07:22
  • I am not too familiar with the deep concepts illustrated although I understand that there are certain rules to follow when asking a question. – Newton Dec 10 '14 at 07:27
  • Please if I'm asking too much whatever you can explain is okay that's fine thanks. – Newton Dec 10 '14 at 07:42

1 Answers1

3

The Gram-Schmidt process is a very useful method to convert a set of linearly independent vectors into a set of orthogonal (or even orthonormal) vectors, in this case we want to find an orthogonal basis $\{v_i\}$ in terms of the basis $\{u_i\}$. It is an inductive process, so first let's define: $$ v_1 := u_1 = (1,1,1,1). $$ Then, by Gram-Schmidt: $$ \begin{align} v_2 :&= u_2 - \frac{\langle u_1 , u_2\rangle}{\langle u_1 , u_1\rangle}u_1\\ &= u_2 - \frac{2+4+1+5}{4}u_1 = (2,4,1,5) - 3(1,1,1,1)\\ &= (-1,1,-2,2). \end{align} $$ and finally $$ \begin{align} v_3 &= u_3 - \frac{\langle v_2 , u_3\rangle}{\langle v_2 , v_2\rangle}v_2 - \frac{\langle v_1 , u_3\rangle}{\langle v_1 , v_1\rangle}v_1\\ &= u_3 + \frac{30}{10}v_2 + \frac{8}{4}v_1 \\ &= (1,-5,4,-8) + 3(-1,1,-2,2) + 2(1,1,1,1) \\ &= (0,0,0,0) \end{align} $$ Now,why are we getting zero? what does this mean!? Basically, getting zero in the last result means your original vectors aren't linearly independent (we should've checked this before doing Gram-Schmidt, but I didn't think about it)! Some basic calculations show that $u_3 -7u_1 + 3u_2 =0$.

Still the previous results work, since $v_1$ and $v_2$ are orthogonal and span $W$ (why?).

hjhjhj57
  • 4,125