Unfortunately, that textbook says nothing about how to deduce that particular recurrence relation, although it has plenty of examples on how to obtain a recurrence relation. In fact, I cannot understand $C_1=1+1+C_0 =2$, which says that we need two comparisons to sort 1 item using quicksort.
If OP's intention is emphasizing how he (meaning them, Donald Knuth and Oren Patashnik) get the recurrence relation, then I can only honestly say I have no credible idea beyond a few educated guesses.
If OP's intention is just to know how to deduce the recurrence relation, then the wikipedia item on quicksort is a nice answer, which I have copied below with minor modification to fit current question.
Assume that there are no duplicates. When the input is a random permutation, the rank of the pivot is uniform random from 0 to $n − 1$. Then the resulting parts of the partition have sizes i and $n − i − 1$, and $i$ is uniform random from 0 to $n − 1$. So, averaging over all possible splits and noting that the number of comparisons for the partition is $n − 1$, the average number of comparisons over all permutations of the input sequence can be estimated accurately by solving the following recurrence relation.
$$
C(n)=n-1+{\frac 1n}\sum_{i=0}^{n-1}(C(i)+C(n-i-1))=n-1+{\frac 2n}\sum _{i=0}^{n-1}C(i) $$
Please note that in the wikipedia item, $C(1)=1-1+0=0$, which say that we need no comparison to sort 1 item, which looks much more reasonable to me