I did see a lot of nice and informative questions, articles on inter-net and on StackOverflow itself, of-course. But I found all the questions or articles following a specific rule or a pattern to explain the topic. I mean, when a question was asked on NFA, DFA or Regular Expression, a solution was presented to the question abiding by the theorems / rules of these topics (Theory of Computation).
But what I feel is that, as most of the questions on DFA/NFA are of the type "Design an NFA...." or "design a DFA..." , I feel that developing/Designing DFA/NFA must be an ART.
And where there is ART I feel there is an intuition. If these problems involve "DESIGNING" something ,then everyone must have their own way (of-course not going out-of-the-way of theorems or rules as such) of solving or attacking these problems. One should have developed a thinking process (over the years of practise) to solve these problems.
So I would like all the experts over this Site to share their knowledge (preferably in simple words) how they think over the problems (simple ones) of these topics.
I would like to elaborate the question with a simple example.
Let F be the language of all strings over {0,1} that do not contain a pair of 1s that are separated by an odd number of symbols. Give the state diagram of a DFA with five states that recognizes F .
Or maybe this:
Design an NFA to find a 4-state NFA for the complement of F.
These questions are from the Sipser's book and I have also found the solutions for them myself.
I just want to know , how one can develop an intuition for solving the problems?