In Sipser's Introduction to the Theory of Computation this is how $0^n1^n$ is proved to be not regular
Example 1.73:
Let $B$ be the language $\{0^n1^n|n \ge 0\}$
We use the pumping lemma to prove that $B$ is not regular. The proof is by contradiction. Assume to the contrary that $B$ is regular. Let $p$ be the pumping length given by the pumping lemma. Choose $s$ to be the string $0^p1^p$. Because $s$ is a member of $B$ and $s$ has length more than $p$, the pumping lemma guarantees that $s$ can be split into three pieces, $s = xyz$, where for any $i \ge 0$ the string $xy^iz$ is in $B$. We consider three cases to show that this result is impossible.
The string $y$ consists only of $0$'s. In this case, the string $xyyz$ has more $0$'s than $1$'s and so is not a member of $B$, violating condition 1 of the pumping lemma. This case is a contradiction.
The string $y$ consists only of $1$'s. This case also gives a contradiction.
The string $y$ consists of both $0$'s and $1$'s. In this case, the string $xyyz$ may have the same number of $0$'s and $1$'s, but they will be out of order with some $1$'s before $0$'s. Hence it is not a member of $B$, which is a contradiction.
In the first condition ($y$ consists only of $0$'s), why would the string $xyyz$ have more $0$'s than $1$'s?
Let's say that $|x|=p-2$ and consists only of $0$'s. $|y| = 1$ and $y=0$, $|z| = p$ and consists only of $1$'s. At this point $|y| > 0$ and $|xy| \le p$.
In this case we would have the same number of $0$'s and $1$'s without violating any of the constraints of the pumping lemma. Of course $xyyyz$ would violate it then, but that's not his proof.
My question is, why does he state that the number of $0$'s is larger than the number of $1$'s for $xyyz$?