I want to check if I understood it in the right way. In some example where $L\in RE$ the explanation deal with 2 cases: 1st when $L$ finite and 2nd when $L$ infinite. In the second case $L\in R$, isn't? Is it possible somehow that $L\in RE\setminus R$ be finite?
Asked
Active
Viewed 173 times
1
-
1The question is unclear to me. For example, I don't understand what you mean by "The second case is ∈, isn't?". Regarding the last question, every finite language is regular and thus decidable. – Bader Abu Radi Jan 15 '21 at 19:49
-
Thanks @BaderAbuRadi, I edited the question is it clear now? – ChaosPredictor Jan 15 '21 at 19:58
-
Sorry, it is still unclear. Are you asking: 1) whether every infinite recognizable language $L$ is in $R$? 2) whether there are finite languages in $RE\setminus R$? – Bader Abu Radi Jan 15 '21 at 20:22
-
Whether there are finite languages in ∖? – ChaosPredictor Jan 15 '21 at 20:25
1 Answers
1
The answer is no. Every finite language is regular, and thus decidable. Therefore the existence of a finite language $L$ in $ \text{RE} \setminus \text{R}$ is impossible. However, note that there languages $L$ in $\text{RE}\setminus \text{R}$ (e.g., $Halt_{TM}$), and by what we have seen previously, such languages have to be infinite.

Bader Abu Radi
- 2,901
- 1
- 9
- 27