LUKS 2 encryption uses Argon2i as the default PBKDF. As the key is used on each access, I guess side-channel attacks are a significant threat factor. However, as I'm not a cryptographer, I am not qualified to say but I'm still interested whether this choice has its grounds.
Specifically, I am not interested in whether Argon2i provides less protection against TMTO, but whether Argon2id provides less protection against side-channel attacks. Also, it is interesting whether using Argon2id is practically safe enough for situations in which side-channel attacks are the main threat factor.