Exmple: $e=3, n=33$ and $d =7$ and Message is $64$.
3 Answers
“Not use (only) RSA.”
While RSA can be used to transport a message smaller than N (well, actually smaller than a different N that fits inside the padding aperture), the usual solution is to send data like
RSA(aesKey) || IV/nonce || AES(aesKey, message)
in the hybrid cryptosystem model.
When dealing with toy implementations of RSA (with 7-bit keys) you could have the message be a 6-bit encryption key, e.g. a Caesar cipher shift index.

- 564
- 6
- 12
You could write $E_3(64)=64^3\equiv(-2)^3\equiv(31)^3\pmod{33}$ to get the values on desired range.
But this is a bad habit in terms of message encryption (and decryption). Generally the message space should be smaller than $\#\mathbb{Z}_{n}$ ( $32$ in this case ). Otherwise the encryption $E_e(x):\mathcal{P}\rightarrow \mathcal{C}$ is not bijective: symbols $64$ and $31$ would produce the same ciphertexts and recovering the plaintext would be difficult (unless some specific protocol is used).

- 225
- 1
- 8
RSA works over $\mathbb{Z}_n$, therefore, you cannot encrypt and decrypt more than $n$ values.
But you can choose the representatives of $\mathbb{Z}_n$ to include other values instead of the classic $\{0, 1, ..., n-1\}$.
For example, if you know that you will never encrypt values smaller than $n/2$, then you can represent $\mathbb{Z}_n$ as $\{n/2, n/2+1, ..., n+n/2\}$, so that you can work some values bigger than $n$.
If you still want to encrypt values from $0$ to $n-1$ and encrypt those additional values bigger than $n$, then there is little to do.
One option is to write the message in base $n$ and encrypt each word, but of course, you get then a vector of ciphertexts instead of a single ciphertext.
For example, $64$ is $(1, 31)$ in base $33$, then you can encrypt $2$ and $1$, which are in the original range $\{0, ..., n-1\}$.

- 6,484
- 21
- 40