This is a monoalphabetic substitution cipher (with a mixed alphabet; in the first section of the article there is a paragraph about its security)
While the keyspace of this cipher is huge (relatively speaking for a classical cipher) with $26!\approx 2^{88.4}$ possible keys, it is still quite easy to break with frequency analysis.
Caesar is much worse of course, because you can simply try out all $26$ possible keys, and that is not possible for a simple substitution cipher (with arbitrary permutation).
Does this then only leave me vulnerable to frequency analysis.
Well, that statement is true. But "more than almost nothing" doesn't mean much.
zqu eqd'm dooe k poz mq eofszwm mjtn; asoguodfz kdkxzntn kxqdo tn nuaatftodm
– r3mainer Feb 27 '17 at 21:52