2

Imagine you take the left side from graphic 1 and right side from the graphic 2, place them that the left and right side are connected horizontally, then you take the sides left from graphic 1 and 2 and connect those the same way and that results in 2 pairs of connected sides forming two new graphics representing something else than they did when connected with their previous side. Is there a term for these kind of graphics? It doesn't strictly have to be left and right sides, it can be top and bottom. The two sides also don't have to be the same size or shape, as long as the connecting side "fits" with the other one.

Leo Ervin
  • 103
  • 7
  • 1
    Seems possibly more like a question for [graphicdesign.se] I think, or at least more likely to get a definitive answer. – Joanne C Aug 27 '16 at 14:35
  • I will try there, thank you. But the graphic could be a painting or a carving. – Leo Ervin Aug 27 '16 at 15:22
  • @LeoErvin It's mostly just the use of the word graphic that is misleading as that usually pertains to digital arts which is off topic here. You are correct that this could be used in other forms besides that like carving and sculptures. Might be harder to see in paintings but it could still work. If you managed to find a picture of what you mean that might help but i suspect you are asking because you cant. FYI please don't double post into another SE. This question could be fine her.e – Matt Aug 27 '16 at 15:29
  • Yeah I cant find anything, I think because I don't know what to search for, that's why I posted here. Anything remotely similar to what I have in mind might be the butterfly locket from the movie The Illusionist. – Leo Ervin Aug 27 '16 at 15:48
  • Reminds me of tessellations.... particularly as they relate to the work of MC Escher. – Catija Aug 27 '16 at 15:51
  • I guess. With tessellations the geometric shapes are usually somewhat similar and simple. – Leo Ervin Aug 27 '16 at 16:04
  • Even Escher's tessellations? –  Aug 27 '16 at 16:08
  • I'm still thinking about it, but tesellations seem to be tileable. What I'm talking about might not fit that criteria. For example , you have a picture on one side where someone is looking right, then on the right side you can swap the image with another image, and the combined image of the left and right side in both instances would look seamless and make perfect sense. What's more is you could take the remaining two sides from the original two images, combine them at the same edge and you would again get a seamless image. Again, not restricted to sides. – Leo Ervin Aug 28 '16 at 06:32
  • With drawings or painitngs it is harder to think why anyone would do this, but with things like bas reliefs you could combine it with some mechanism where sides of two pieces could be rotated and/or repositioned by the viewer. With digital art it could also be easily represented as a 2d or 3d animation. – Leo Ervin Aug 28 '16 at 06:35
  • I'm not sure if you're referring to exquisite corpse or not, but it may be of interest. Basically different sections of different images are pieced together with seamless widths to create a unique illustration. – johnp Aug 31 '16 at 17:50

2 Answers2

2

The surrealist technique of combining sections of different images in order to create a unique composition is referred to as "Exquisite Corpse" or "Cadavre Exquis" (Ambrose & Harris, 2011). By aligning the sections creatively or along a similar outline, one can achieve very unexpected results, as in the following example

enter image description here

In these cup designs by Chloe Lee Carson, sections of different illustrations have been combined to create unique characters. Note that despite the name of this technique, Cadavre Exquis is not limited to animal or human imagery. In fact, it began as a word game where sentences were constructed in a similar unxexpected fashion. According to the Tate website, the technique's name is derived from one of the first games that resulted in: ‘Le cadavre exquis boira le vin nouveau’ (‘The exquisite corpse will drink the young wine’).

Reference: Harris, P. & Ambrose G. (2011), Basics Design 02 - Layout, AVA Publishing

johnp
  • 558
  • 1
  • 3
  • 11
  • While the majority of images I could find have two features which aren't necessary to fit my idea, this still seems to be what I was looking for. Those features being: 1) human or animal sections being the "pieces" I was desribing, not something else like scenery, 2) being 3 pieces and vertical to each other. – Leo Ervin Sep 01 '16 at 14:10
  • Hi @LeoErvin . Despite the use of the word "corpse", this technique isn't restricted to animals or humans (or even images). I just felt this example was easier to understand. Cadavre Exquis actually began as a word game. See more here – johnp Sep 01 '16 at 16:02
  • The "Exquisite Corpse" is a drawing formed by one artist drawing a section then (often) obscuring it by folding and passing the work to another artist who contributes the next section and so on, using only the hints of the drawing revealed at the edge of the folds to provide continuity. It can be done without the folds but the collaborative nature of the process is key. – rebusB Nov 20 '23 at 19:02
1

I think what you are describing is known as a "tessellating pattern".

Most famous practitioner of this art, in my opinion, was the Dutch artist Maurits Cornelis Escher.

I'm not sure if I can post an image here of Escher's work as it's copyright protected by the Escher foundation.

An example of Escher's work showing the tessellating pattern in action can be seen in the piece titled Regular Division of the Plane III, 1957

Escher's work showing the tessellating pattern.

Escher's work showing the tessellating pattern

To learn more about M.C. Escher then check out the M.C. Escher Foundation and The M.C. Escher Company.

Ken Graham
  • 952
  • 1
  • 9
  • 24
John Vukelic
  • 2,946
  • 12
  • 11
  • No reason you can't post an example picture. Or link directly to the official website –  Aug 27 '16 at 22:49
  • Not sure about the use of an image showing an example of Escher's work.. Even under the "fair use" policy its a tricky thing to know when its okay and when its not. Wikipedia gives a list of conditions that need to be met to be considered fair use but its hard to tell exactly when the conditions are met and when they are not. The Escher foundation has a form they want filled out if your want permission to use any of Escher's works. Licensing included for profit and not for profit (such as blog posts or even general discussion) http://www.mcescher.com/licensing/. – John Vukelic Aug 27 '16 at 23:38
  • 1
    A vital part of the definition of tessellation is that it fills a space. I don't think it fits the question as I understand it. – Martha Aug 28 '16 at 00:40