Summary
In short, I will argue for the BOTH option: gift (from God) and trust (from us). The growth I wouldn't call "skill" but "virtues". Also keep in mind that Christian faith is primarily a relational quality of a journey with another person, like faith in someone's spouse in the marriage journey.
Faith has 2 dimensions:
- rational: this is a light given to us by God, which enables our soul to mentally see (akin to an "aha" moment when something "clicks") the truthfulness of the claims of Christianity, although our reason (which can be characterized also as a light that, unlike the light of faith, humans possess permanently) is left unsatisfied because reason wants more than what's available via reflection of the image given by the senses. But when the mind is further illumined by the light of faith, our reason CAN CONCUR, just as we also believe "by faith" the date of our birth told to us by our parents and believe "by faith" the birth certificate given to us by the government. This is a distinct "yes" or "no". Either you believe or you don't.
- journey: this is trust in a person Jesus who wants to form our soul into more conformance with Him, and who has given us His Holy Spirit who in turn infuses us with growing faith, hope, and charity (the 3 theological virtues). This infusion is gradual so faith can grow, consistent with Jesus's allusion to faith having a "size" (Matt 17:20-21) and with other NT passages such as 2 Thess 1:3 ("your faith is growing abundantly").
But discerning whether one has the "correct" faith is not always easy, especially if one believes a distorted gospel (the easy OSAS gospel, the performative/ritualistic gospel, the prosperity gospel, etc.). Just like in marriage which is quintessentially a journey with a rational dimension as well, one starts a relationship with Jesus with certain expectations that once the tire hits the road there bounds to be questions, doubts, hardship, re-evaluations, etc. which can be significant depending on whether one's understanding has been correct from the beginning. So there can ALSO be growth in the rational dimension ALTHOUGH it STILL does not invalidate the discrete "yes" or "no". Several cases:
- Deconversion: Someone used to declare himself Christian but no longer a believer due to realizing he was sold the wrong gospel, or that his faith is falsely preconditioned on the Bible being inerrant the way his church promotes it
- Confusion: Someone who STILL wants to believe but is having intellectual doubt; she still goes to church and still practices her faith as usual
- Growth in understanding: This is a very established tradition of "faith seeking understanding", implying growth in the rational dimension of faith although the tradition emphatically asserts that no matter how much higher the level of understanding has become, it is STILL lacking the clarity we will attain in heaven by the light of grace.
- Switching church: Someone who finds another Christian tradition to be more helpful in his journey with Christ (ex. Calvinist becomes Catholic). In this case, the faith is intact but his understanding matures.
- Suffering: This is doubt when trying to reconcile one's loss / suffering with one's understanding of God as loving and present. Many believers are NOT spared this experience (in one degree or another), and many are processing this experience differently. C.S. Lewis's processing (A Grief Observed and the movie Shadowland) is one of the most cited and studied in recent times.
The meaning of "faith" in Christianity
We are about to launch into a description of the experiential and subjective dimension of faith so given the nebulousness and ambiguity of the experience itself (where even God meddles somewhat unpredictably, John 3:8), it's critical to delimit what we mean by "faith" in this answer, which is the easy part.
The pertinent meaning of "faith" you ask has 2 dimensions:
- The rational dimension: hearing, understanding, and believing God's saving plan for us individually AND collectively (humanity) through Jesus Christ, as revealed to us by the OT & NT prophets and apostles who left us a record of their testimonies in the Bible.
- The journey dimension: allegiance to Jesus as our Lord and Savior, thus implying our individual willingness
- to be docile lambs being led by Jesus the Shepherd (John 10:1-18)
- to be fed by Jesus the Bread of life (John 6:22-59)
- to walk in the light of wisdom shown to us by Jesus the Light of the World (John 8:12) and to be yoked with him (Matt 11:28-30) so our path will be illuminated by Jesus's light and our decisions are marked by wisdom
- to be a fruitful branch connected to Jesus the True Vine (John 15:1-8)
- to use Jesus as a measure for a True Person, the ideal image to which we are being formed because Jesus is the Truth, John 14:6. Note that "The Truth" here is different than the truth of a proposition (the normal meaning of the word) since Jesus is a human person, but truth in the carpenter's sense: Jesus truing us like a carpenter truing his squares.
- to imitate Jesus in loving God and neighbors like Jesus the True Friend (John 15:9-17), when situations call for it
Measuring our experience: does it deserve to be called "faith" as defined above?
I purposely phrase the meaning of "faith" above so it can be used as a measuring stick as we honestly reflect on our own experience vis a vis God and vis a vis the claims of Christianity. In his sermons my current pastor always explicitly speaks to 3 types of audience: seekers, new believers, mature believers. I think this is an excellent strategy, which I also use below:
For the seekers, my pastor would help make the gospel easier to accept intellectually by removing various objections relevant to the text he preaches on or by clarifying what it means to follow Christ and its benefits. He is following the tradition of presenting Christianity as a set of claims that can be understood rationally, of which C.S. Lewis is a prime example who famously said
"I am not asking anyone to accept Christianity if his best reasoning tells him that the weight of evidence is against it"
(learn more through this article C.S. Lewis on Faith and Reason).
But does faith necessarily results when all one's intellectual objections have been answered? NO. More is needed.
New believers are those who undergo these 3 steps in the first few years of becoming Christian:
Minimal understanding of the "gospel": who Jesus is, what accepting His spirit into one's heart means (i.e. born again), and what this action entails in one's subsequent life when united with Christ. This is the intellectual dimension; regular reason operating here, unaided by faith. The gospel is the "proposal" to be believed. In Christian traditions that teach that faith is rational, this proposal CAN be understood by reason alone, and IS a prerequisite to proper faith. Unfortunately, many skeptics remain at this stage.
The reception of "the light of faith" given by God. A very good 2021 lecture about this by a Catholic priest of the Dominican order (following the teaching of Aquinas) is The Light of Reason and the Light of Faith. The lecture only covers the contrast of the light of reason vs. faith, but from my personal experience (as well as others), it is usually accompanied by other kinds of experience as a result of this light:
- recognition of one's sinfulness (leading naturally to repentance)
- "aha" moment that God is trustworthy as described in the proposal (it's "aha" for those who come to faith only as an adult, but more like "confirmation" for those who have already believed the claims of Christianity since childhood)
- conviction that giving away your life to Jesus makes sense (one can see the happiness that can result from dying to self)
- decision to be baptized with Jesus's death and resurrection and to become his disciple for life, "for better or for worse, so help me God" (because the future of where Jesus would lead us is unknown).
The nurturing of the mustard seed of faith as discipleship commences, where one consciously integrates Jesus into one's life. Again, imagine life with your spouse after the wedding. In this step, our will and effort predominate:
- making efforts not to commit sins one used to do, asking the Holy Spirit to be given grace
- killing sinful desire (concupiscence) and replacing it with the desire for wholesome actions, sometimes need to DO them first with desire and feeling to follow
- following the church's practice such as meditating on the Bible, frequenting the sacraments of confession and Eucharist, regular prayer life, examination of conscience, etc.
Once this gets going, the New believer is on the road to become a Mature believer where faith bears fruit in loving actions. The Bible talks more about growing in fruit & love rather than growing in faith, but it's natural that faith grows together as we reflect on the years that we have been with Christ, just as couples do on their 5th, 10th, 25th, and 50th wedding anniversaries. I now have more faith in my wife than in our wedding day precisely because of the years we have been together although the "aha" moment (the reasonable seed of trust) when I decided to marry my wife was already present since before the wedding. Wedding here is very analogous to public baptism in a credo-baptist church.
Mature believers are those who are past the initial shocks of being united with Christ. This is beyond the scope of this answer, but some of the characteristics:
- More intellectual understanding of the faith through studying the Bible, theology, and philosophy
- Less likely to be swayed by non-Christian opinions because of BOTH the time spent in studying as well as the increasing quality of the experience with Jesus
- More experience in processing hurts, suffering, and disappointment that God let believers to experience precisely to mature our faith and love.
Answering specific concerns in your question
I have addressed all the angles you raised above, so what follows are quick comments.
Is faith a skill that can be developed and made stronger through effort, following a method?
What follows only apply to New & Mature believer stage. In a sense, yes, it's a "skill", although traditionally named "virtue" which is a "habit", i.e. a predilection of trusting God in the midst of hardship / suffering / depression of one's sinfulness, etc. Yes, it can grow through BOTH our effort and God's grace following a method prescribed by your church. In religious orders they follow a regula or a rule such as the famous Rule of Saint Benedict that can be adapted to laypeople use. In fact, my pastor did a sermon just a few days ago to encourage us to develop our own individual practices following a daily "rhythm of life" as the "method" in 8 rubrics: prayer, Scripture, Stillness, Simplicity & Generosity, Relationship, Hospitality, Vocation & Mission (pursuing justice & peace), Health & Maturity (spiritual, emotional, and physical maturity).
If such a method exists, can it be tested, and by any human being? In other words, if the most skeptical atheist takes on the challenge of applying this method thoroughly and meticulously, would he or she reap the fruit of faith eventually over time?
You confuse 2 stages of faith: before the "aha" moment and after; the method for each is VERY different but YES, it can be tested.
In the previous section I already talked about the method to grow in faith. Just like growing in any skill, one may not see it right away, but in times of testing.
For the Seekers, I can think of one useful method below (NOTE: people are complex, there are bound to be other methods out there). The "test" is step FOUR. But please note, it's NOT the following the method that guarantees result, just like a study guide is not a guarantee to pass a Calculus final exam. God's grace is STILL the necessary ingredient but I believe the method below will at least create a conducive environment by having the right state of mind:
FIRST they need to sort out major intellectual objections until they are faced with a credible proposal, experientially like being faced with a decision whether to accept a proposal of marriage (after some years of courtship), which at this point STILL has an element of risk and uncertainty.
SECOND, it also involves "laying down your weapons", realizing that one cannot fight concupiscence by one's own effort. One needs help. Eleonore Stump likens it to someone who has "crashed and hit bottom", finally realizing that one needs "professional help" like an alcoholic, or one needing anger management counseling, etc. See this 13 minute video How Does Salvation work, the "professional help" section starts at around minute 6:00.
THIRD, say to God something like this:
"I want to will the good, but I'm conflicted. Sometimes I do, sometimes I don't. Also, I cannot heal my desire for sins on my own. Not only that, even though I want to be healed but some part of me says I don't. Here's what I'm going to do. I'm just going to CEASE RESISTING and let You operate on me."
What this does is issue an invitation to God to heal us. This way, we UNITE our will with God voluntarily, not exactly saying "Yes", but just to cease resisting (a.k.a. quiescent, a third mode of the will proposed by Eleonore Stump, to learn more see a review of her book 'Atonement').
FOURTH, while maintaining that state of receptivity, wait for that "aha" moment to happen, as we continue our reflection of our sorry situation as well as reading up on God's plan for us in the Scripture and reading about God using other spiritual and devotional texts.
Or is faith rather a gift, a supernatural gift, given by God only to a privileged subset, and therefore not attainable via effort?
The debate whether this gift is available only to the privileged subset is a Calvinist teaching, which by the way cannot be summarized that way either. There is STILL interaction with free will (which is complex subject). But my answer's point of view is definitely NOT Calvinistic, so although it is NOT Pelagian either, some form of conscious response by us is contributary to coming to faith.
Or is faith both a gift and a skill, requiring some sort of synergistic cooperation between the will of the person and the grace of God?
The light of faith to trigger the "aha" moment is DEFINITELY 100% gift, but we can ask for it. Maybe for kids who were raised in the church (like I did) this light was given much sooner when as kid we innocently ask Jesus to come to our hearts (I attended Sunday school since I was 5). The synergistic cooperation is most clear in the growing phase, after the "aha" moment.
What is an overview of perspectives on the nature of faith, what causes it, how it can be attained, how it can be made stronger, the extent to which any person on the planet (including the most skeptical atheist) can acquire it by exercising their own free will by following a particular method?
"What causes it" is unanimous across all Christian traditions: grace of God. "How it can be attained" is similarly unanimous: ask God in prayer. "How it can be made stronger", there are many methods BUT as mentioned above, it's very important the separate the method for non-believers vs. for believers who already have the initial mustard-seed-faith.
Would you say that a better and more standard term for the 'aha' moment you refer to in your answer is the 'born-again experience'?
Well, what IS exactly this "born-again experience"? I hesitate to equate the two because theologically "born again" is associated with the coming indwelling of the Trinitarian life who comes rushing into someone's soul, WHILE the "aha" (experienced as a realization) is associated with the act of faith aided by grace (i.e. the "light of faith"). I think the main problem is that most Christian theologies DO NOT PRESCRIBE an epistemological description of how we should experience those 2 events. We can only reflect on them ex post facto based on the effect of God's action where we CAN answer:
- whether we have faith or not (simple answer to the question "Do you trust Jesus as your Lord and Savior")
- whether the Spirit of God is living in us (by the fruits of our lives)
For example, if you find yourself to bear grudges and not forgiving, even if the Spirit of God may live in us imperceptibly, certainly the Holy Spirit is not operating, maybe blocked by our stubbornness. Other people are usually a better judge, after all Jesus says it's easier to see a speck in someone's eyes.
Then there's the matter of different traditions giving different answers regarding WHEN the Trinitarian life begins. In a pedobaptist church (Lutheran, Catholic, and some Reformed), it was since one was an infant concomitant with the sacrament of baptism, but that infant is expected to understand the teaching later and thus having conscious faith only later. So the baptism/"born-again" event precedes "conscious faith" event.
If a baptized infant reaching the age of youth now claims to have a significant experience of contrition and gratefulness (which in the evangelical circled is labeled "born-again"), this church will interpret the experience as the Trinitarian life who is already present since baptism becoming active and giving one the grace to "see" their sinful state AND to be more conscious of one's implicit trust in Jesus. Thus it's an experience of appreciating what has been done before (baptism) and of having possessed the light of faith that was given in an unknown past. That is my own personal experience.
Is that significant contrition experience (that evangelicals labels "born-again") an "aha" moment for me (I was in college at the time)? I hesitate to say so, since my trust in Jesus has never been troubled since as early as I can remember, even while I was having a lot of intellectual questions. I would say in my case that I have always possessed the light of faith (for which I'm thankful). When did it come? I don't know. By the way, not knowing when the light of faith comes is STILL consistent with how the "light of faith" operates as described in the lecture; after all, the main audience were Catholics who have been baptized since infants. For sure, my understanding of the faith and my trust in Jesus itself increases. But if during youth this infant-baptized believer rejects Christianity and rejects Jesus (while understanding correctly what he/she is doing), the pedobaptist church will explain it as he/she rejecting the Trinitarian life, which humans can well do (we don't need help rejecting, but we need help receiving).
In contrast, in a credo-baptist church, the sequence is: conscious faith FIRST (after regeneration), conscious invitation SECOND, followed by the Holy Spirit rushing into the believer's soul (which is NOT promised to be perceptible! except possibly by older Pentecostals where you are expected to speak in tongues), and THIRDLY the willingness to be baptized (keeping in mind that this baptism is merely a seal, not an instrument). So the instrument for receiving the Trinitarian life is "faith", not possible in an infant.
But regardless of the 2 different sequences, a serious believer who has reached the age of reason will eventually process their emotional / epistemological experience ex post facto in terms of the earlier imperceptible "two theoretical events" of 1) RECEIVING the Trinitarian life (the proper meaning of "born again") and 2) POSSESSING the light of faith given by grace. At this point the believer can consciously "test" the presence of the 2 dimensions of faith by using the measuring stick I described in the 2nd section above by BOTH declaring that Jesus is his/her Lord and Savior AND by showing some evidence of being a disciple of Jesus.
That's why in most churches (with the exception of a church teaching classical Pentecostalism, etc.) it is NOT necessary for one to have a SPECIAL "born-again" experience. Instead, they will focus on the EFFECT, which fortunately for us IS measurable: others that really know you will know your character, whether similar to Jesus or not.
If one does a heroic act of forgiving an enemy who acted grievously against one's family for example, they would credit it to a higher level of faith or to a higher activity of the Spirit of God living in them. But on the other hand, if one is backsliding, or even worse, denying Jesus freely, then it's clear they may no longer have the Spirit of God living in them at that time. I think is wise; highly emotional conversion experience can be deceptive. After all, Jesus himself warned (in the Parable of the Sower, Matt 13) of a seed that fell on rocky places or among thorns. Thus, most good churches focus on discipleship, training believers to keep their life of faith active by being close to fellow believers, doing regular acts of forgiveness, love, thanksgiving, and almsgiving, having frequent prayers & sacramental life, etc.