77

My textbook mentions that SCUBA tanks often contain a mixture of oxygen and nitrogen along with a little helium which serves as a diluent.

Now as I remember it, divers take care not to surface too quickly because it results in 'the Bends', which involves the formation of nitrogen bubbles in the blood and is potentially fatal.

If that's the case, why not use pure oxygen gas in SCUBA tanks? It seems like a good idea since it would

  • a) Enable divers to stay underwater for longer periods of time (I keep hearing that ordinary SCUBA tanks only give divers a pathetic hour or so of time underwater.

  • b) Possibly eliminate the chances of developing 'the Bends' upon surfacing. Well, it seems plausible, that is if the diver were to take a 10 minute deep-breathing session with pure oxygen to flush out whatever nitrogen's there in his lungs before hooking up a cylinder of pure oxygen and going for a dive. So if there's no gaseous nitrogen in his lungs and blood, then he wouldn't have to worry about nitrogen bubbles developing in his system.

Now those two possible advantages aren't hard to overlook, but since no one fills SCUBA tanks with pure oxygen, there must be some reason that I've overlooked, that discourages divers from filling the tanks with pure oxygen. So what is it?

Also, I hear that the oxygen cylinders used in hospitals have very high concentrations of oxygen; heck, there's one method of treatment called the Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy (HBOT) where they give patients 100% pure oxygen at elevated pressures.

Hence I doubt whether the increase in pressure associated with diving is the problem here. So I reiterate:

Why is it a bad idea for divers to breathe pure oxygen underwater?

I guess most of the recent answers have kinda missed a main point, so I'll rephrase the question:

Why is it a bad idea for divers to breathe pure oxygen underwater? If it is indeed due to pressure considerations as most sources claim, then why doesn't it seem to be a problem when patients are given 100% pure oxygen in cases like the HBOT (which is performed at elevated pressures) ?

Gaurang Tandon
  • 9,788
  • 11
  • 65
  • 118
paracetamol
  • 18,649
  • 29
  • 106
  • 169
  • 2
    You will be breathing the same air pressure, but it will all be oxygen. This will increase the amount of dissolved oxygen in your blood. It's a little bit analogous to putting a burning tissue into an atmosphere of pure oxygen, I would think. I don't know exactly what causes the toxicity, but I'd guess that it's related to that increased rate of oxidation. –  Oct 22 '16 at 21:40
  • 3
    You can breathe pure oxygen in low pressure without problem. The Apollo 1 used this, but after the Apollo 1 accident many things have changed – phuclv Oct 23 '16 at 07:37
  • 2
    The amount of air-time which SCUBA tanks provide underwater depends on the depth at which you are breathing. This can be much less than 1 hour for deeper dives. The volume that is contained in your lungs does not change, but the pressure at which that gas is supplied depends on depth. Thus, the static volume of gas contained in your tanks will provide a lower number of breaths at deeper depths (higher pressure). The time which you can spend at a particular depth without the need to decompress is also dependent on the depth. – Makyen Oct 23 '16 at 15:25
  • 3
    There is a vast difference between what is considered safe when directly under the care and observation of a doctor in a hospital (Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy) using medical grade equipment and what is reasonable for unsupervised recreational diving. – Makyen Oct 23 '16 at 15:29
  • 1
    Not mentioned so far, but for long operations underwater you can use rebreathers. They work by recycling the nitrogen, scrubbing the CO2 and replacing it with fresh oxygen. Complex and risky - it introduces a whole new set of failure modes. – MSalters Oct 24 '16 at 07:19
  • 1
    Hyperbaric oxygen therapy isn't safe for a healthy person! Oxygen is very toxic, and a brutal oxidising agent - it's dangerous enough breathing it at standard pressure (oxygen radicals are one of the main causes of genetic damage), and it only gets worse at higher partial pressures. HBOT is used on people who have some trouble with normal oxygen absorption - for example, due to embolism or carbon monoxide poisoning. Those problems make it harder for oxygen to attach to red blood cells, which means you need a higher partial pressure of oxygen to keep the blood oxygen content proper. – Luaan Oct 24 '16 at 07:46
  • Im sorry, Why this question doesn't have an accepted answer? –  Jun 06 '18 at 22:47

6 Answers6

75

The other answers here, describing oxygen toxicity are telling what can go wrong if you have too much oxygen, but they are not describing two important concepts that should appear with their descriptions. Also, there is a basic safety issue with handling pressure tanks of high oxygen fraction.

An important property of breathed oxygen is its partial pressure. At normal conditions at sea level, the partial pressure of oxygen is about 0.21 atm. This is compatible with the widely known estimate that the atmosphere is about 78% nitrogen, 21% oxygen, and 1% "other". Partial pressures are added to give total pressure; this is Dalton's Law. As long as you don't use toxic gasses, you can replace the nitrogen and "other" with other gasses, like Helium, as long as you keep the partial pressure of oxygen near 0.21, and breathe the resulting mixtures without adverse effects.

There are two hazards that can be understood by considering the partial pressure of oxygen. If the partial pressure drops below about 0.16 atm, a normal person experiences hypoxia. This can happen by entering a room where oxygen has been removed. For instance, entering a room which has a constant source of nitrogen constantly displacing the room air, lowering the concentration -- and partial pressure -- of oxygen. Another way is to go to the tops of tall mountains. The total atmospheric pressure is lowered and the partial pressure of oxygen can be as low as 0.07 atm (summit of Mt. Everest) which is why very high altitude climbing requires carrying additional oxygen. Yet a third way is "horsing around" with Helium tanks -- repeatedly inhaling helium to produce very high pitched voices deprives the body of oxygen and the partial pressure of dissolved oxygen in the body falls, perhaps leading to loss of consciousness.

Alternatively, if the partial pressure rises above about 1.4 atm, a normal person experiences hyperoxia which can lead to oxygen toxicity (described in the other answers). At 1.6 atm the risk of central nervous system oxygen toxicity is very high. So, don't regulate the pressure that high? There's a problem. If you were to make a 10-foot long snorkel and dive to the bottom of a swimming pool to use it, you would fail to inhale. The pressure of air at your mouth would be about 1 atm, because the 10-foot column of air in the snorkel doesn't weigh very much. The pressure of water trying to squeeze the air out of you (like a tube of toothpaste) is about 1.3 atm. Your diaphragm is not strong enough to overcome the squeezing and fill your lungs with air. Divers overcome this problem by using a regulator (specifically, a demand valve), which allows the gas pressure at the outlet to be very near that of the ambient pressure. The principle job of the regulator is to reduce the very high pressure inside the tank to a much lower pressure at the outlet. The demand valve tries to only supply gas when the diver inhales and tries to supply it at very nearly ambient pressure. Notice that at depth the ambient pressure can be much greater than 1 atm, increasing by about 1 atm per 10 m (or 33 feet). If the regulator were to supply normal air at 2 atm pressure, the partial pressure of oxygen would be 0.42 atm. If at 3 atm, 0.63 atm. So as a diver descends, the partial pressure of oxygen automatically increases as a consequence of having to increase the gas pressure to allow the diver to inflate their lungs. Around 65 m (220 ft), the partial pressure of oxygen in an "air mix" would be high enough to risk hyperoxia and other dangerous consequences.

Now imagine a gas cylinder containing 100% oxygen. If we breathe from it at the surface, the partial pressure of oxygen is 1 atm -- high, but not dangerous. At a depth of 10 m, the partial pressure of supplied oxygen is 2 atm -- exceeding acceptable exposure limits. This is a general pattern -- raising the oxygen fraction of diving gasses decreases the maximum diving depth.

And you can't lower the partial pressure much because the lower limit, 0.16 atm, isn't that much lower than the 0.21 atm of sea level atmosphere.

One general category of solutions is to change gas mixes at various depths. This is complicated, requires a great deal of planning, and is outside the scope of your question. But it is certainly not as straightforward as just simplifying the gas mixtures or just raising the partial pressure of oxygen.

Additionally, compressed oxygen is a relatively annoying gas to work with. It is not itself flammable, but it makes every nearby organic thing flammable. For instance using grease or oil on or near an oxygen fitting risks spontaneously igniting the grease or oil. Merely having grease on your hand while handling oxygen refilling gear (with a small leak) can burn your hand.

EIG
  • 75
  • 1
  • 9
Eric Towers
  • 909
  • 5
  • 6
  • Whoa, nice answer! But would you also happen to know why patients subjected to HBOT (Which is at pressures exceeding atmospheric pressure) are given 100% pure oxygen? Yet again, thanks for the answer, it was pretty good! ^_^ Though it didn't answer everything in the question :/ – paracetamol Oct 23 '16 at 06:39
  • 3
    @AaronAbraham: Some of the use-cases for HBOT are things that reduce blood oxygen (e.g. CO poisoning or lung injuries), but I'm curious about other use-cases. Maybe they monitor for signs of oxygen toxicity and stop the treatment if necessary? Otherwise, maybe it's worth the risk or small amount of damage? Maybe it matters that you're at rest during HBOT, not exercising by swimming around? (breathing more shallowly?) – Peter Cordes Oct 23 '16 at 10:33
  • 2
    " It is not itself flammable, but it makes every nearby organic thing flammable." - define "flammable". – John Dvorak Oct 23 '16 at 12:26
  • 2
    Grease on your hand does not ignite when it gets in contact with pure oxygen at ambient pressure. An oily cloth is something different, there the heat can build up. – Karl Oct 23 '16 at 12:48
  • So if air mixtures become toxic around 220 ft, do technical dives below that depth have to use lower oxygen mixtures? I know that there are dives that go that deep, but wouldn't they be risking hypoxia during their descent/ascent/safety stop? – nworb99 Oct 23 '16 at 15:06
  • @AaronAbraham : I am not a doctor, but my understanding from various readings is that tissue damage, especially to the lungs, can impede the uptake of oxygen leading to sub-normal oxygen uptake. (The equilibrium concentration of oxygen in the blood falls because the source term, oxygen in the air, is situationally reduced. This is vaguely like effusion.) One solution is to push more oxygen at higher pressure to increase the source term and establish a higher concentration in the blood. Note that CNS oxygen toxicity is a known hazard of HBOT. – Eric Towers Oct 23 '16 at 23:28
  • @Karl : The oxygen escaping from a leak at a tank refilling station will not be at ambient pressure. Typical SCUBA tanks carry 175-300 atm and are filled by compressors working with gasses up to around 350 atm, although this maximal pressure is usually only present in a small part of the compressor. Jab in a leak at a random place, though, and you can expect to receive gas initially at 200 atm. I haven't directly observed the effect of placing organic valve grease in such an environment, but I have seen the charred bits of a compressor that had been part of such an "experiment". – Eric Towers Oct 23 '16 at 23:38
  • 1
    @JanDvorak : Don't really want to get pulled into that quagmire. However, the NFPA placard for oxygen lists Flammability: 0. The USCG CHRIS code lists oxygen as "not flammable". The DOT places compressed oxygen in class 2, "Non-flammable gas". So, by appeal to various authorities, I'm comfortable calling (even compressed) oxygen "not flammable". (Several of these note that oxygen can enhance combustion, a sentiment with which I heartily agree.) – Eric Towers Oct 23 '16 at 23:43
  • 1
    @nworb99 : Deeper dives involve switching gasses to mixtures with lower oxygen partial pressure. You may find the term "bottom gas" to describe the mixture to be used at maximal depth. (Beware "nitrogen" narcosis, a different hyperbaric inert gas hazard not discussed in this answer.) Trimix 12/52 (12% oxygen, 52% helium, 36% nitrogen) has a partial pressure of ~1.3 atm at 100 m (equivalent to air at 43 m). (Although helium is not magic. See high pressure nervous syndrome.) – Eric Towers Oct 23 '16 at 23:54
  • @EricTowers Once it is out of the leak, it IS at ambient pressure. A running compressor has hot parts, that's a bit different from your 35°C fingers. – Karl Oct 24 '16 at 09:26
  • 1
    @Karl : Once it is out of the leak, it expands and cools while decreasing its pressure from 200 atm to 1 atm. This is not instantaneous. The rate is thermodynamically limited. See Joule-Thomson expansion. Additionally, I'm not interested in any argument that directly contradicts provided photographic evidence. – Eric Towers Oct 24 '16 at 16:00
  • Oh, I am also not interested in this argument, im my case because it involves hearsay physics and anecdotal evidence. Good we agree on something. ;-) Oh, you are also right that oxygen is not flammable. – Karl Oct 24 '16 at 16:10
  • I can't get what do you mean here: "If you were to make a 10-foot long snorkel and dive to the bottom of a swimming pool to use it, you would fail to inhale. The pressure of air at your mouth would be about 1 atm, because the 10-foot column of air in the snorkel doesn't weigh very much. The pressure of water trying to squeeze the air out of you (like a tube of toothpaste) is about 1.3 atm. Your diaphragm is not strong enough to overcome the squeezing and fill your lungs with air. " With an oxygen pressure of 1.4 atm, it is bigger than the external pressure, so inhalation will be possible... –  Jun 06 '18 at 23:26
  • @santimirandarp : There is no oxygen pressure of 1.4 atm. There is you, trying to inhale. Surrounding you is water at the bottom of a column of 10 ft. (about 3 m) of water, squeezing you (and especially your torso) from all sides with 1.3 atm of pressure. At your mouth is a snorkel. It contains air at the bottom of a column that is (depending on your definitions) 100 km + 3 m, so is at a pressure of 1 atm. Your diaphragm has to expand against 1.3-1 = 0.3 atm compression. Your diaphragm has to inflate your chest against 0.3 ton/sq. ft., which won't happen. – Eric Towers Jun 06 '18 at 23:47
  • @EricTowers But you are describing a person with a pure oxygen supply at 1.4 atm, isnt it? that's what I get from the text; otherwise, why do you say 'So, don't regulate the pressure that high? There's a problem' –  Jun 06 '18 at 23:49
  • @santimirandarp : A person at the bottom of a swimming pool with a snorkel poking up in to the atmosphere is breathing air, not pure oxygen. The problem this person experiences is that they cannot expand their lungs because of the difference in water pressure and air pressure. It does not matter what the gas is, they cannot inhale. This is just at 10 feet, at greater depths, the gas must be supplied at greater total pressure. – Eric Towers Jun 07 '18 at 02:00
  • Yes I think I have problems with your English, I got that perfectly, thanks... –  Jun 07 '18 at 02:03
30

Our body is used to the environment around us. Once you change part of the environment, you have to be ready for the consequences.

Inhaling pure oxygen is the cause for what is known as oxygen toxicity.

Oxygen toxicity is a condition resulting from the harmful effects of breathing molecular oxygen $\ce{(O2)}$ at increased partial pressures.

High concentrations of oxygen result in a considerable concentration of various radicals, one of which is hydroxyl and can engage in a chain reaction that deteriorates lipids in cell membranes.

Mechanism of oxygen toxicity

By Tim Vickers, after Young IS, McEneny J (2001). "Lipoprotein oxidation and atherosclerosis". Biochem Soc Trans 29 (Pt 2): 358–62. PMID 11356183.Vectorized by Fvasconcellos. - w:Image:Lipid peroxidation v2.png, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=1728531 Click for a larger version

Different settings have been proposed to minimize the damage of oxygen toxicity, one of which is hyperbaric oxygen therapy.

M.A.R.
  • 10,576
  • 19
  • 71
  • 93
16

As a certified SCUBA diver, I learned that breathing pressurized pure oxygen leads to oxygen toxicity, which can be fatal. However, I'm not anywhere near an expert on the mechanism of oxygen toxicity, but I believe it has to do with resulting in a lot more reactive oxygen species which can cause oxidative stress and lipid peroxidation. I'm not really offering this as a good answer (since I don't know much about it) but more as an invitation for someone who does know more about it to expand on it.

Additionally, since the air we normally breathe is about 78% nitrogen and only 21% oxygen, it doesn't really seem healthy in my opinion to up that concentration of oxygen from 21% to 100%.

Here's a picture from Wikipedia that shows oxygen reacting with a lipid radical to create/propagate lipid peroxides, which cause cell damage. lipid peroxidation

nworb99
  • 103
  • 8
9

At five meters depth (1.5 bar absolute pressure), pure oxygen becomes toxic after ten-15 minutes or so already. After an hour or two, the effects can set in at snorkeling depth. That makes it rather not useful for any diving purpose. For continued exposure, the partial pressure of oxygen should be kept below 0.6 bar.

For medical use (hyperbaric medicine), high oxygen partial pressure can be useful, although I belive there is some discussion about how useful it actually is. Very few things in medicine have no drawbacks and dangers.

Karl
  • 12,053
  • 2
  • 30
  • 61
  • Maybe for medicine they use pure oxygen but not higher than a critical absolute pressure? –  Jun 07 '18 at 00:05
  • @santimirandarp High absolute pressure is cumbersome, because you need a slow decompression afterwards. Hence the use of pure oxygen at only moderately increased abs. pressure. – Karl Jun 07 '18 at 05:50
  • Yes, I just was saying because it possibly answer the last part of OP question... –  Jun 07 '18 at 14:55
9

I'm not a chemist but I want to chime in for the SCUBA part.

Normally recreational divers dive with compressed air (21% O2).

There is a special education to learn and use 32% and 36% O2 air mixures. This is called Nitrox (at least at PADI).

The benefit is you can dive longer and make more dives per day (since it displaces N2) but you have to dive shallower. This is popular on multi dive occasions like dive safaris on ships.

This is also not always avaliable on site.

Further, since no one mentioned it yet, the apparatus to provide and refill 100% O2 for recreational use would be quite dangerous.

Industrial/Technical divers who dive very deep use helium mixes and what not, to simply go very deep.

I heard that, military divers sometimes use very high O2 mixtures to go long distances very shallow (4m max) - but I'm not sure thats true.

birdspider
  • 199
  • 4
5

Oxygen, especially pure oxygen likes to steal electrons.

By stealing electrons it "corrodes" other elements into their oxides. Think of iron rusting. So, as we are composed of elements, too much oxygen for too long will increase our rate of oxidation, damaging our cells.

TheLegendaryCopyCoder
  • 151
  • 1