I appreciate Karsten Theis for his effort to solve this problem, but I have to say that I completely disagree with the structure he has come with as the answer (as a matter of fact, I came up with the same structure but it didn't fit the given $\ce{^1H}$-$\mathrm{NMR}$ spectrum; vide infra). Followings are my reasons:
As correctly pointed out by Karsten Theis, the resonance at about $\pu{174 ppm}$ of the $\ce{^{13}C}$-$\mathrm{NMR}$ spectrum indicates a presence of an ester carbonyl carbon. The quartet at about $\pu{4.05 ppm}$ and triplet at about $\pu{1.15 ppm}$ in $\ce{^{1}H}$-$\mathrm{NMR}$ spectrum indicates a presence of $\ce{-O-CH2-CH3}$
group, as hinted by OP's teacher. The presence of $\ce{-O-CH2\!-}$ fragment is confirmed by the resonance at about $\pu{60.0 ppm}$ in $\ce{^{13}C}$-$\mathrm{NMR}$ spectrum.
The second triplet at about $\pu{2.20 ppm}$ in $\ce{^{1}H}$-$\mathrm{NMR}$ spectrum also indicates a presence of $\ce{-CH2-C(=O)-}$ fragment. Thus, Karsten Theis' suggestion of the presence of $\ce{-CH2-CO-O-CH2-CH3}$ fragment is correct. But here is the problem. The proton signal of $\ce{-CH2-C(=O)-}$ fragment displays a triplet, not a doublet as Karsten Theis' suggested structure would have given in reality. Consequently, most possible fragment should have been $\ce{-CH2-CH2-CO-O-CH2-CH3}$ (total of 5 carbons).
Since the $\ce{^{13}C}$-$\mathrm{NMR}$ spectrum shows only 6 carbon resonances and the molar mass of the compound is suggested to be about $\pu{258 g mol-1}$, the compound should have at least one plane of symmetry as suggested by OP. It is also noteworthy that the intensity of the third carbon from the right in $\ce{^{13}C}$-$\mathrm{NMR}$ spectrum is almost double compared to other possible $\ce{-CH2 \!-}$ carbon signals. Therefore, arguably, the compound should have at least two $\ce{-CH2-CH2-CO-O-CH2-CH3}$ fragments plus two $\ce{-CH2 \!-}$ parts, giving that $\ce{C14H26O4}$ molecular formula (molar mass of which come up as $\pu{258.36 g mol-1}$ that agrees with the given value). Thus the structure should be:

The molecule is diethyl decanedioate, with molecular formula of $\ce{C14H26O4}$ and molar mass of $\pu{258.36 g mol-1}$. To confirm the structure, let's look at the integrations given in $\ce{^{1}H}$-$\mathrm{NMR}$. The proton signal of $\ce{-CH2-C(=O)-}$ at around $\pu{2.2 ppm}$ is integrated as $1.00$, meaning one proton is equivalent to $0.25$ integration value. The integration value of the triplet and the multiplet coincided with it at the range of $\pu{1.1-1.3 ppm}$ is marked as $3.5$, thus is equivalent to 14 protons $(\frac{3.5}{0.25} = 14)$. Also, the integrations of multiplet at $\pu{1.55 ppm}$ and quartet at $\pu{4.05 ppm}$ are marked as $\approx 1$, and hence each of them is equivalent to 4 protons. Thus, the total proton count is $3 \times 4 + 14 = 26$ protons, which agrees with the suggested molecular formula.
Further, the ChemDraw stimulated $\ce{^{1}H}$- and $\ce{^{13}C}$-$\mathrm{NMR}$ spectra for the suggested molecule are shown below:

Both spectra are in good agreement with actual spectra, specifically see the overlapped carbon signals at around $\pu{29 ppm}$. However, the triplet at around $\pu{1.07 ppm}$ has moved downfield to $\pu{1.17 ppm}$ in real time spectrum, showing more deshielded nature, probably due to the presence of oxygen at $\beta$-position.
Edit:
As Buttonwood has suggested, it is always better to compare your data with experimentally recorded data. The SDBS Database, which provides the spectral data of compound in interest under SDBS 2666 has given following $\ce{^{1}H}$- and $\ce{^{13}C}$-$\mathrm{NMR}$ spectra to compare:

Both spectra match the given spectra of the compound.