Questions tagged [change]

Splitting a transaction and sending some of the coins back to the sender. Necessary for some currencies due to the design of the protocol.

With Bitcoin and its relatives, the protocol specifies that when a transaction spends an output of a previous transaction, it must spend the entire amount. If the sender doesn't actually want to spend that much, the new transaction includes an extra output, sending the remaining coins back to a (new or existing) address belonging to the sender. This is called change by analogy with the real-world process of paying a large note for a small purchase, and receiving the difference back in smaller denominations.

More information can be found at https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Change.

132 questions
2
votes
1 answer

Why are change addresses not associated with an account in your wallet?

From what I understand change addresses are automatically generated when you use sendtoaddress but what I don't understand is why these change addresses don't become automatically associated with the sending account. What is the reason for this?
1
vote
1 answer

My bitcoin change

I am new to this.I have sent out bitcoin over the blockchain before and saw that the hash just took a fee. However the other day it took out over.95 of a bitcoin when wanting to only send 0.04 of a bitcoin to binance. I was told they send you an…
Paulmac61
  • 21
  • 2
1
vote
1 answer

Explorer showing different balance then my Blockchain wallet

My Blockchain wallet address on the explorer, shows a low balance (under .001) but when I log into the wallet I can see what should be there about .25 BTC. My Electrum wallet is also doing the same. When I look at the explorer I see "unspent"…
CoinQuest
  • 11
  • 1
  • 2
1
vote
1 answer

Why did the remaining money go to another address?

I'll try to be short. I gifted 1 BTC to a friend several months ago. She is a completely non-technical person. She tried to send a small fraction of that 1 BTC to her brother, and either she seriously messed something up, or fell a victim to some…
alexakarpov
  • 113
  • 6
0
votes
1 answer

Tamper - evident log with hash pointer

We know that the hash of the previous block is included in the header of the next block. So, if an adversary change the data in the block no. 10, then they hash of it will be changed and the header of the block no. 11 will be no longer true. But,…
SayyedAli
  • 3
  • 3
0
votes
1 answer

2 mBTC that was outputted as change in a transaction I just sent didn't come back to my wallet

Hi I'm new to this so may be asking a stupid question. I just sent a payment for 198.52 mBTC. There were two outputs. One for 196.39 mBTC that arrived. There was another output of 2 mBTC that didn't arrive and wasn't refunded to the first wallet. I…
Wilbur
  • 81
  • 1
  • 1
  • 5