2

What I'm trying to derive

The cartesian position of the lunar ascending node relative to the true equator and equinox of date reference frame. My issue is I'm getting a bit tripped up with reference frames.

My attempt

Consider the moon at a time $t$. Let $r,v$ be the position and velocity of the moon at $t$, measured from the center of the Earth. Suppose $r,v$ are expressed in some reference frame $R$, denoted as ${}^{R}r$ and ${}^{R}v$.

The moon's specific angular momentum vector $h$ is given by

$$ {}^{R}h = {}^{R}r \times {}^{R}v $$

The lunar node's are defined as the points where the moon crosses the ecliptic plane, and the vector the the lunar ascending node is given by

$$ N = K \times h $$

where ${}^{\text{EC}}K = (0, 0, 1)$ is the unit $\hat{z}$ vector orthogonal to the ecliptic reference plane, denoted $\text{EC}$. We want $N$ in the desired frame $D$. Let ${}^{B}M_{A}$ be the rotation matrix from frame $\text{A}$ to frame $\text{B}$. Then,

$$ \begin{align} {}^{D}N &= {}^{D}M_{\text{EC}} \cdot {}^{\text{EC}}N\\ &= {}^{D}M_{\text{EC}} \cdot \left( {}^{EC}K \times {}^{EC}h \right)\\ &= {}^{D}M_{\text{EC}} \cdot \left( {}^{EC}K \times \left( {}^{EC}M_{\text{R}} \cdot {}^{R}h \right) \right)\\ \end{align} $$

Is this correct? Am I missing anything here?

Hunter
  • 321
  • 5
  • That looks ok to me. When doing stuff like this I like to check my results against Horizons. The Moon's specific angular momentum (relative to the geocentre) isn't constant, but it only varies by ~1%. I have a graph here. Rather than using the geocentre as the origin it's probably better to use the EMB (the Earth-Moon barycentre). The Earth/Moon mass ratio can be calculated to very high precision, using the data on https://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/astro_par.html – PM 2Ring Mar 16 '24 at 04:40

0 Answers0