10

I am constantly reading that the Sun is at least 20% 'hotter', in terms of total radiation/luminosity, than it was a few million years after its formation (i.e., after the Hayashi stage...)

But what about its absolute temperature? I know that it hasn't changed as much, but has it increased (or decreased) at all?

Peter Mortensen
  • 301
  • 2
  • 8
Kurt Hikes
  • 5,077
  • 12
  • 39
  • 7
    Let's hope your sources say, that the sun is 20% brighter, not hotter. 20% of the temperature would be a whopping 1000K – planetmaker Jun 11 '23 at 00:22
  • 1
    See https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/14535/why-is-the-suns-brightness-and-radius-increasing-but-not-its-temperature – ProfRob Jun 11 '23 at 15:36
  • The sun is a near-perfect (at the scales we are talking about) black body radiator. Power per square meter is the 4th power of temperature. If the sun is brighter, it must be either larger or hotter. – Yakk - Adam Nevraumont Jun 12 '23 at 15:19
  • Two out of three answers were plagiarised (now deleted). Don't they have any shame? – Peter Mortensen Aug 09 '23 at 13:22

1 Answers1

16

From the Wikipedia article on the sun, it is about 150 K:

The Sun is gradually becoming hotter in its core, hotter at the surface, larger in radius, and more luminous during its time on the main sequence: since the beginning of its main sequence life, it has expanded in radius by 15% and the surface has increased in temperature from 5,620 K (5,350 °C; 9,660 °F) to 5,777 K (5,504 °C; 9,939 °F), resulting in a 48% increase in luminosity from 0.677 solar luminosities to its present-day 1.0 solar luminosity.

That Wikipedia page indirectly sources a paper from the Gaia mission observing sunlike stars which allow verification of these values by comparison with other solar mass stars of different ages: Gaia Data Release 3: A golden sample of astrophysical parameters

Peter Mortensen
  • 301
  • 2
  • 8
planetmaker
  • 19,369
  • 3
  • 46
  • 80
  • Only covers the main sequence. – ProfRob Jun 11 '23 at 15:36
  • 3
    One should add in that the gradual changes you quote happened of a time period of 4,6 billion years, very gradually indeed. – quarague Jun 12 '23 at 06:25
  • this raise further questions. how to they know that distant stars are similar to the sun (by mass and age and radius)? how do they know that the temperature was 5620 C? how do they know that luminosity was 0.677? etc – BЈовић Jun 12 '23 at 06:52
  • 1
    @BЈовић these are all perfectly fine questions to ask, but require significantly more space and time to answer than what's afforded in the couple paragraphs that fit in a SO answer. – Cubic Jun 12 '23 at 08:16
  • @BЈовић: Those are great questions; feel free to post them as top-level questions, linking back to this question, as recommended by "What is the the best way to ask follow up questions?" . – David Cary Jun 12 '23 at 18:39
  • I'll be watching for the follow up questions. I, too, wonder how a time sequence for the Sun can be created when the only parameters that don't change with time (not much anyway) are mass and composition, with mass being hard (to say the least) to directly measure. I believe that our current estimates have just been from modeling. – Jack R. Woods Jun 12 '23 at 23:44