7

What image sensors (imaging electronics) are used in telescopes? Like CCD, is that the best option?

What is the typical physical size and resolution of the photo-sensitive surface of the currently active largest ones?

peterh
  • 3,161
  • 4
  • 22
  • 40
Ilya Gazman
  • 245
  • 1
  • 8

1 Answers1

6

The current largest digital CCD camera is that of the Vera C. Rubin Observatory1 which has a whopping 3.2 gigapixels. The previous largest features on the Panoramic Survey Telescope & Rapid Response System (Pan-STARRS), and has a resolution of ~1.4 gigapixels.[1]

Based on the spec sheet provided by the Vera Rubin Observatory, the LSST camera has a resolution of roughly 0.2 arcseconds per 10 $\mu$m pixel. It is about 5 feet (1.52 meters) wide and weighs over 6000 lbs (2721 kilos, $2.6\times10^9$ dyn).[2] The actual photosensitive portion of the camera is ~64 cm ($4\times10^{34}$ Planck lengths) across.

Cameras of this size often have pointing, calibration and recording issues. These sources of error are usually extremely well understood, but it's still interesting to see. Pan-STARRS has a detailed list on their data site[3]. These issues include:

  • Randomly missing data that gets filled in later
  • Pointing errors related to astrometric positions of their targets
  • Registration issues near the celestial pole resulting in poor photometry

1formerly known as the Large Synoptic Sky Survey or LSST. The acronym has now been repurposed: What is the LSST now? Where does LSST end and Vera C. Rubin Observatory begin?

Joseph Farah
  • 286
  • 1
  • 4
  • Can we choose SI or imperial units. – ProfRob Jan 05 '21 at 21:19
  • @ProfRob I chose the primary units I did in order to be consistent with the spec sheet provided by Vera Rubin Observatory (linked in answer). However, as a possible resolution, I have updated the answer with additional unit conversions to SI. – Joseph Farah Jan 05 '21 at 21:24
  • cgs please! you're an astronomer! ;-) – pela Jan 06 '21 at 08:50
  • 1
    due purely to @pela 's charm, I have provided the weight estimate in dynes. – Joseph Farah Jan 06 '21 at 14:55
  • Although the camera as a whole may be this size (1.2m is closer to 4 feet than 5 incidentally), the sensor array is 64cm across. – Steve Linton Jan 06 '21 at 15:05
  • 64cm is about $4\times 10^{34}$ Planck lengths, incidentally – Steve Linton Jan 06 '21 at 15:06
  • @SteveLinton the 1.2 meters was a typo--great catch! And thanks for the additional info on the camera, I've updated my answer to include it. The 64 cm spec is provided on the same page about the camera I cited for the statement before, so I didn't add an additional source. I've also included the unit conversion you suggested to truly make the answer a smorgasbord. – Joseph Farah Jan 06 '21 at 15:08