1

I have submitted a paper and I received a request for major revisions.

The first time the status changed from "under review" to "with editor". After that I submitted a revised version of the paper. Now the status has changed from "under review" to "required reviews completed".

  • Why first time it wasn't shown this status?
  • How many days does it usually take to change the status from "required reviews completed" to next status?
Jeromy Anglim
  • 20,310
  • 9
  • 72
  • 108
  • 1
    I'm not clear what you are asking. What do you mean by "first time"? On your original submission? Are you just asking how long it takes for revisions to be evaluated by the editor? – Jeromy Anglim Apr 21 '17 at 02:06
  • Yes, original submission. I want to know about the differenc between with editor and required reviews of completed after under review. Before revision the editor mentioned we are interested to publish work and comment for reviewer questions. Is it positive sign. Also time taken to evaluate reviewer recommendation by editor – Rajasekar Gutha Apr 21 '17 at 02:12
  • Why first time it wasn't shown this status? – What makes you sure about this? – Wrzlprmft Apr 21 '17 at 07:34
  • I don't know why first time it wasn't shown – Rajasekar Gutha Apr 21 '17 at 13:05

1 Answers1

2

Most likely this means it has passed to the associate editor to decide what to do with the reviews. In my experience the deadline for that action is typically about a week from the time the final review is available, but of course if the editor is otherwise occupied, it might take a while longer. Patience!

Fred Douglis
  • 5,457
  • 2
  • 23
  • 40