28

I'm in a total disaster right now because it feels like I have no chance of being a researcher anymore. Months ago, I submitted my Bachelor's thesis. Days later, I realized that I printed a wrong version of it (the version before the final) so I asked permission from my adviser and the librarian if I can replace the copies because of the mistake. They allowed me.

Weeks later, I realized that there was a term in my abstract that might need to be cited. But for the record, I cited this term in the body of my research. I consulted my adviser whether or not I violated something with that. She said that it was okay because I already cited it in the body of my research. However, I insisted and ask if I can add a citation just to be sure. She said okay. So I had to replace my copies of thesis again.

Lately, it occurred to me again that there was something wrong again. I think that I failed to cite a secondary source in the 'limitations' part of my thesis. Although I already have cited this secondary source as a secondary source 2 sentences before the sentence in question, I still feel that it was not sufficient because we had another similar quotation from an author in the sentence in question. I don't remember exactly why I failed to cite the secondary source in that sentence again. But as far as I can remember, I accessed the primary source. Maybe that is why I did not cite the secondary source.

But it still bothers me because even if that's the case, it might still look like I copied that part of my thesis (although not verbatim, but it totally bothers me still). That's the only problematic part of the whole research. I would like to correct this and give a more sufficient citation for the secondary source, but as I have mentioned, I already corrected my copies twice and they might not allow me anymore. I am so devastated right now, I am afraid that this might bar me from doing research again. Or worst, they might take away my degree which I really worked hard for.

How do you think will my adviser react to this? The last time I amended my thesis, I said that it will be the last time. But this mistake is unbearable and I can't live a day without thinking about it. What if the other faculty members will know? What will be their reaction? I have a perception that academicians are perfectionists and might persecute mistakes like this even when done unintentionally. I don't know what to do, I really don't know what to do.

  • 168
  • The vast majority of published research articles--let alone student theses--contain minor errors. 2. No one cares about a few minor errors. 3. What you describe barely even counts as an error.
  • –  Sep 20 '16 at 06:05
  • Do the errors in these "vast majority of published research articles" contain citation errors too? –  Sep 20 '16 at 07:13
  • 46
    @Grimacese: more than you would think. While one should try to get things right before the first submission, these seems to be so minor that what worries me more is your attitude. If you can't stand such honest mistakes, will you stand being proven wrong? It is very rare for a researcher to never be proved wrong, so if you consider a career in research you need not to let your emotions be out of control -- but still care enough that you do things the right way. – Benoît Kloeckner Sep 20 '16 at 09:32
  • 53
    No worries. Bachelor's theses are rarely read by anyone, and even then it's usually not in detail enough to notice any errors. Learn from this for next time, when you write your PhD thesis, which might be read more widely (for example, five people instead of two). – Gimelist Sep 20 '16 at 09:36
  • 1
    @BenoîtKloeckner: Indeed, one of my concerns right now is how to deal with my attitude. Something about your comment confuses me, though. You said that "It is very rare for a researcher to never be proved wrong." It is somehow equivocal. Did you mean that despite minor honest mistakes, researchers will still be proven wrong and may be persecuted? –  Sep 20 '16 at 10:16
  • 27
    @Grimacese: I just mean that it happens that one's error is pointed out by a referee, or that one's published result is later shown to be an artifact. This is not about persecutions, it is about the normal process by which science progresses, which includes mistakes, some of which take time to be acknowledge. – Benoît Kloeckner Sep 20 '16 at 10:20
  • 4
    Relax. Many Nobel-winning scientists have published papers with shockingly bad errors. No-one cares about a bachelor's thesis. – TheMathemagician Sep 20 '16 at 11:22
  • 52
    True story: about a year after I finished my graduate degree, I was reading over the printed and bound copy and noticed that my introduction—you know, the first page of actual text—is only half-written. The last sentence just stops right in the middle and there's no concluding sentence at all. I checked the LaTeX source... no error, I just never wrote the end of my introduction. Whoops. – eykanal Sep 20 '16 at 13:49
  • 26
    At the level of fixation on these errors you're describing, I would strongly advise you to seek serious help before further pursuing a career in a field like research that naturally encourages people to be so self-critical. If you have been this fixated on issues in an undergraduate thesis, you will have serious trouble functioning well through the process of writing paper for publication, reports, proposals, and a graduate thesis. Please talk to a trusted mentor and/or a mental health professional about this before charging forward and figuratively impaling yourself. – Phil Miller Sep 20 '16 at 21:06
  • 2
    @Novelocrat, I was trying to find a nice way to say it, and then you did. Grimacese is going to have quite the wake up call if they actually make it to grad school. – Sam Sep 20 '16 at 21:20
  • 1
    @Sam They are new, they will learn... – Crowley Sep 20 '16 at 23:52
  • 13
    I think your biggest mistake is worrying too much about those tiny mistakes (so tiny that they might not be mistakes at all). – Andreas Blass Sep 21 '16 at 00:08
  • 3
    My very first paper has a typho on the first word of the abstract. That was more than 10 years ago, I do call myself a researcher and I'm getting paid for it, so... – Fábio Dias Sep 21 '16 at 02:12
  • 7
    @Grimacese, is it possibly that you're dealing with excessive anxiety in the sense of OCD/scrupulosity? I've got some experience with this and I wonder if this isn't what you are struggling with. I don't really enough to go on from your words, but if you worry about other things in your life this way, you might consider speaking with a mental health professional. No more shame in doing that than seeing a doctor for a broken ankle, and it can help immensely. – Corvus Sep 21 '16 at 05:22
  • 14
    @Grimacese - Let's be perfectly clear here. Nobody is persecuted in academia unless they willfully, knowingly, and purposefully produce fabricated research, or plagiarize others work, with the intent of deceiving others. If you are not trying to do any of these things on purpose then you really, really don't need to worry. – J... Sep 21 '16 at 13:15
  • 2
    Persecuted or Prosecuted? –  Sep 21 '16 at 13:27
  • 2
    @J... This could be an answer. – Crowley Sep 21 '16 at 13:39
  • @Crowley that's the problem, that "they will learn" is taken for granted, with an assumption that any issues students may have are categorically sub-clinical. A disturbing fraction of my friends and colleagues had or developed real, clinical-grade mental health issues over the course of their graduate careers, in many cases spurred directly by the environment in which they were immersed. I'll assert that addressing these issues systematically would result in lower incidence, greater productivity, and lower costs/impacts on students, faculty, and programs. – Phil Miller Sep 21 '16 at 23:52
  • @Novelocrat I have never heard a teacher saying "You've made a mistake, never mind, that happens". Neither verbally, neither in body language. But I know a lot teacher saying "How dare you submitting such foolish scrap to me?" If one have too much stick and very little carrot the can easilly prsume, that the "high-rank academia" is this unfriendly. – Crowley Sep 22 '16 at 08:44
  • Striving for perfection is NOT a mental disorder, people. Stop suggesting he has issues. Please stop encouraging laziness. If you are unable or refuse to see the difference between striving for perfection and a legitimate case of OCD, you are not very scientifically minded. –  Sep 22 '16 at 18:45
  • To be honest, as a grad student I read this and immediately thought, "Man, I wish I had written a bachelor's thesis..." – tonysdg Sep 22 '16 at 19:36
  • 1
    My bachelor's thesis has something in it that's completely wrong. However it doesn't invalidate any proofs (it's math), and nobody reads bachelor's theses anyway, so I never had a problem. I got my PhD. – Matt Samuel Sep 22 '16 at 23:16
  • @Grimacese "Did you mean that despite minor honest mistakes, researchers will still be proven wrong and may be persecuted?" Another thing to reflect on as far as your take on this goes is why you implicitly connected "being proven wrong" with "being persecuted". Those are two completely different and independent things. You certainly have a lot to think about! :) – Jason C Sep 23 '16 at 02:11
  • 1
    take a deep breath. – henning Sep 23 '16 at 07:55
  • 4
    @Physics-Compute Sentences like "I'm in a total disaster right now because it feels like I have no chance of being a researcher anymore" go way beyond striving for perfection and into unwarranted anxiety. In my experience anxiety disorders are common among successful academics and mean time between onset and diagnosis is over a decade. Talking w/ a mental health professional is no sillier than getting your eyes checked if you don't yet wear glasses. I stand by the advice to at least consider whether this could be part of the issue. – Corvus Sep 25 '16 at 02:08
  • 2
    Please don't vandalize your post. See I've thought better of my question; can I delete it? for further details. – ff524 Oct 21 '16 at 05:06