53

I found some relevant advice on the first day of teaching online (e.g. here, here, here, and here). Common themes include setting expectations, motivating the course content, and having two-way interactions with students.

Besides for reviewing the syllabus (and relevant university-wide policies referenced but not located in the syllabus), how can an instructor most effectively use the first class session? Are there any especially effective ways to do these things on the first day of a class?

o-0
  • 7,610
  • 1
  • 18
  • 35
ff524
  • 108,934
  • 49
  • 421
  • 474
  • 23
    I took a great number of classes where the professor handed out the syllabus on the first day -- which was usually already available online -- and then told us to go home. I recommend against that strategy! – rhombidodecahedron Jan 21 '15 at 12:24
  • 2
    What level of students you are about to teach? Kindergarten or PhD? – Ooker Jan 21 '15 at 13:21
  • 2
    Show a movie; everyone will love you! – CaptainCodeman Jan 21 '15 at 14:15
  • @Ooker OP mentions university policies, so it is at least undergraduate level. – TylerH Jan 21 '15 at 16:39
  • 10
    Everyone knows that on the first day of class, you've got to find the biggest, meanest-looking student and take him down in front of everyone. Er, wait, maybe that advice wasn't for classrooms. – Nathan Long Jan 21 '15 at 19:19
  • 7
    As a recent student, please don't waste everyone's time reviewing the syllabus! Make it available, tell the students they're responsible for reading thoroughly and understanding it, then start teaching. – Robert Jan 21 '15 at 21:13
  • 1
    I do an ice-breaker activity to make sure students learn each other's names and relax. Cheesy, but it helps. And I always hope it leads to students forming study groups. – Matthew Leingang Jan 22 '15 at 04:00
  • @MatthewLeingang: Of course, that's only sometimes possible. Depending on the class size and the university, classes may be too large (100+ students) to have any expectation of learning each other's names, or even with smaller classes, participants may have the expectation to remain anonymous listeners rather than a visible party in a public conversation. In the latter case, trying to "break the ice" might rather have the effect of a "scarecrow" and instantly relieve you of most of the audience. (Sure would have that effect on me when I just expect to listen to a lecture.) – O. R. Mapper Jan 22 '15 at 12:24
  • 1
    @O.R.Mapper: no, I don't do this in large lectures. In those I do an intro slideshow with useful info and jokes. – Matthew Leingang Jan 22 '15 at 14:03
  • @Robert, it is not a waste of time. Even doing that I still get students asking stuff that was covered on that part. It is important that the basic rules are clear from the go. I even had a case when the professor asked us to sign the syllabus, saying that we read and understood it... – Fábio Dias Jul 29 '16 at 14:43
  • @FábioDias You spent the class's instruction time reading the syllabus and still had students fail to understand? Sounds like a waste to me. Of course it's important for everyone to understand the basic rules. The question is whether it's necessary or helpful to read it to them. I think it's reasonable to hold adult students responsible for reading and understanding the syllabus on their own time. – Robert Jul 29 '16 at 15:07

9 Answers9

62

Students basically want to know if they should take your class. To that end I would include

  1. A short (10-15 minute) sales pitch explaining what exactly your class is about and why your topic is interesting.
  2. Administrative details of the class (I would cover this after the sales pitch, so students who are late don't miss anything).
  3. A presentation on the first topic in your syllabus. This is important because hearing your first lecture will give them a good idea of the difficulty of the class, which prerequisites are required, and the style/quality of your lecturing. Also, if your entire first lecture is a sales pitch, students will feel like they wasted time coming to your class, or that your class is "easy"/not serious.
Ben Bitdiddle
  • 5,923
  • 1
  • 32
  • 55
  • 2
  • ...and students that choose not to follow the course don't have to listen to the administrative stuff! :)
  • – clabacchio Jan 21 '15 at 17:17
  • 11
    The importance/duration of #1 should be dependent on the level of course that you're teaching. If it's a common course that people are already familiar with and that has a self-explanatory title (like "Intro to Chemistry" or "Probability and Statistics"), I would recommend spending less than 10 minutes on the intro. If it's an advanced course or has an obscure title (e.g. "Defense Against the Dark Arts"--a real course title where I'm studying), a full 10-15 minutes is time well spent. (My $0.02.) – apnorton Jan 21 '15 at 19:09
  • 1
    @anorton Have a link for the real-life DADA course? – Federico Poloni Jan 21 '15 at 22:02
  • 1
    @FedericoPoloni The only public course site I can find offhand is pretty old, but the course is still taught: http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~cs351-dada/ – apnorton Jan 21 '15 at 22:11
  • 4
    Sometimes professors spend 10 minutes to discourage students from taking the class (because the class is unexpectedly packed). – kon psych Jan 22 '15 at 05:21
  • 3
    There's really no need to cover administrative details. They're all online, and your students are perfectly capable of looking them up themselves. Just get to the content! – sapi Jan 22 '15 at 06:39
  • Yeah, you can also try to be as boring as possible to make students drop the class if the class is packed. – user541686 Jan 22 '15 at 07:38
  • If you do it correctly you can make the unprepared students want to drop while the prepared students stay in the class. – Ben Bitdiddle Jan 22 '15 at 09:25
  • 3
    @sapi: As a student, I always found a presentation of administrative details very helpful; like any information, administrative details can be subject to inquiries that are best discussed in class. Nonetheless, even if one relies on much administrative information being available online, one bit of such information that we usually make available only in the class is the access data to much of the course material and course systems. And lastly, don't forget that the administrative information is just as much a part of the "sales pitch" as the course contents (which is of course online, too). – O. R. Mapper Jan 22 '15 at 12:17
  • 2
  • may actually be mandatory. At my university, regulations require the teacher to fix e.g. the mode of the exam during the first week of the lecture period. (I'm not sure if an online listing is sufficient.)
  • – Raphael Jan 23 '15 at 14:45
  • 1
    @O.R.Mapper I always found it a waste of my time (in my experience this is also way less common in Europe than the US) - any student not capable of reading a simple A4 page of information should fail any course by default. If there are any questions, students can always ask at the start of the next lecture (and if it's a reasonable confusion, the teacher should fix the syllabus for next year). Teach me stuff that I couldn't comprehend as easily by just spending five minutes reading a sheet of paper! – Voo Jan 24 '15 at 14:51
  • 1
    As a TA: Presentation of administrative details is extremely important. You can't depend on a student to look them up and understand that they, for example: "can't take the exam copy from the classroom", because as soon as they're brought in for academic violations, they say "Well, I was never explicitly told..." The factual in-class presentation puts the onus on the student to live up to the course expectations. The class I taught even had students physically sign that they understood the course policies. Some students claim they didn't see the policies, until they see their own signature. – Ramrod Jan 26 '15 at 09:46
  • @FedericoPoloni a recent link for dada: http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~ww6r/CS4630/ – Fábio Dias Jul 29 '16 at 14:46
  • I took a course in abstract algebra that spent the first week (three lectures) reviewing basic computations on classic groups (eg. addition over a small modulus) and by the fourth week attempted to prove Schur-Zassenhaus. The onus of "hearing your first lecture will give them a good idea of the difficulty of the class" falls on the professor, imo. – Alex Reinking Nov 14 '16 at 12:40