-1

I entered academia despite my suboptimal "stats" (GPA, research experience, etc.) because I was allured by the idea of focusing on a research project. Even my Master's advisor noted how I jumped into the literature head-on (despite other metrics in my Master's program as questionable — GRE scores, GPA - by both him and the program director). I got into a PhD program at an R2 in Experimental Psychology despite this (they took 10 people out of 88 from 2015-2016 to 2020-2021 so not exactly competitive).

My first advisor at this Ph.D. program was someone whose research interests overlapped with mine. She was also the founder of a program at my high school that trained teachers on how to instruct neurodivergent individuals. Since I graduated from a high school class of eight students, an advisor-advisee match like this was unheard of and blew my mind at the time I applied to the program. I had to bite my tongue each time I recalled what we had in common, so there was no conflict of interest prior to admission to the program. In the end, she dumped me as an advisee due to a misunderstanding, and her exit from the program.

I had challenges at the bachelor's and Master's levels, not with fulfilling the raw requirements, but everything else that was an unwritten expectation I had to fulfill and no one told me about until it became a problem. Even though I'm in a better position now (full-time instructor NTT for a year at a SLAC and I got a fellowship on top of that), I can't bring myself to do anything else other than data collection for my dissertation even though my new advisor has been fantastic and wants me to do more projects with him.

I do not have any publications or a lot of "hard skills" that would make me a shoe-in for a lot of places post PhD (not even a postdoc). Participating in a system that's more exclusive than inclusive has been painful. I did not even know what an R1 or R2 was at the time I applied to programs at all. I had one offer in the end with someone whose research interests overlapped with mine at the time before she left the program, but I now have to fight an uphill battle since my PhD is not exactly from a recognizable name like an R1. I was blissfully ignorant of how all of this worked and I wish someone could've gone back to me at the time I finished my Master's (2020) to convince me to extend to my program and do an internship or something else instead of this PhD. I need to finish this program and graduate, as per my fellowship obligations, but I am terrified of the post PhD world compared to if I just had my master's. I set myself up for misery.

Does anyone have any advice for my situation? What can I find that's less ambiguous work wise?

realkevlar
  • 634
  • 1
  • 14
zzmondo1
  • 1
  • 2
  • 16
  • 35
  • 1
    What if I don't have Imposter's Syndrome though? I seriously think that all evidence I have up until this point elucidates that I was not ready at all. – zzmondo1 Sep 10 '23 at 22:17
  • 1
    If you post questions on this site, it is likely you have imposter syndrome. I think no more evidence is needed. – Anonymous Physicist Sep 10 '23 at 22:46
  • @Allure Your answer to that question of the guy failing out has helpful info but I'm honestly not sure how I'm supposed to take that given I'm not exactly on track to failing graduate school. I'm just finishing with the bare minimum in this case. – zzmondo1 Sep 11 '23 at 01:30
  • 3
    Yes, but it's very similar - in both cases you look for a job, using the skills you did learn as the selling point. It's obviously better to graduate successfully than to fail out, so you've already done better in that sense. – Allure Sep 11 '23 at 01:33
  • @Allure I see now. That's fair. Not sure of this helps (and I may edit my post accordingly), but I'm going to get reevaluation results for neurodivergent, psychiatric, and psychological conditions soon. Although I could sell my skills for research assistant positions, I'm not confident I could fulfill all of those duties with how much my poor stress management affects my ability to function. All therapy I've had over the years has failed sadly and that's because my body can only tolerate stress to a certain point and I need to minimize stressful work (which is sadly most post Ph.D jobs). – zzmondo1 Sep 11 '23 at 02:00
  • There are some jobs in academia which are low-stress (and low-pay), ones of a "specialist", a person who has just one valuable skill and uses it exclusively and repeatedly, e.g. CRISPR gene editing. You have to talk to an expert to see if they can help you to identify such a skill if you have one. – Moishe Kohan Sep 11 '23 at 02:46
  • @MoisheKohan It is interesting you mention that since I've considered Research Assistant positions in the past. I personally don't mind doing literature reviews and doing the other "grunt work" involved with research. It's just the leadership stuff that comes with many positions is where I find my body turns against me once its stressed. – zzmondo1 Sep 11 '23 at 08:23