0

What are some examples where there is a discrepancy in the mathematical definition of a term?

For example :

$\bullet$ Isosceles triangle: "exactly two sides are equal" or does it say "minimum two sides are equal"?

$\bullet$ Binomial Coefficient: $ {n \choose r} a^r \cdot b^{n-r}$ or $ {n \choose r} a^{n-r} \cdot b^r$

Are there any other such examples?

1 Answers1

3

There are notations and terms in mathematics that have different conventions. For example, to some $\Bbb N$ is {$1,2,3,...$}, whereas to others $\Bbb N$ is {$0,1,2,3,...$}. For another example, some say a set is countable if there is an injective function from it to $\mathbb N$, whereas others say it has to be bijective. For another example, to some the dihedral group $D_n$ has $n$ elements, and to others it has $2n.$ In all of these cases, a writer using these should indicate which convention is being followed.

J. W. Tanner
  • 60,406
  • 1
    I would phrase the ambiguity with countably as "Some say a set is countable if it an injective function exists from it to $\mathbb{N}$ others say it has to be bijective. – Q the Platypus Jun 16 '19 at 13:40
  • Sincere question for @QthePlatypus: Why would you phrase it differently from the way I did? – J. W. Tanner Jun 16 '19 at 23:23
  • The way you phrase it sounds like the finite sets are arbitrarily thrown into the class of countable. But saying it has an injection into the naturals gives a single rule and suggests how you would prove that something is uncountable. – Q the Platypus Jun 16 '19 at 23:53
  • I guess I was trying to be less technical by saying some say a set is countable if it has the same cardinality as $\Bbb N,$ whereas to others it also includes the case where the set is finite, but I have edited based on the feedback – J. W. Tanner Jun 17 '19 at 00:10